Briefings

Briefings

| Home

HAARP | Chemtrail photos from Sussex UK | Briefings | Chemtrail Correspondence | US Congress | European Parliament | UK Parliament


Menu






Chemtrails

The Space Preservation Acts

HAARP and the US Congress

European Parliament and HAARP

UK Parliament and HAARP

HAARP and Mind Control





Briefings

These are based on the briefings I prepared for a UK Parliamentary environment lobby group meeting on 18th July 2005. Additional information on HAARP and mind control compiled 24th July.



Michael Nield


Briefing on Chemtrails


The only reference to chemtrails I have found is in Kucinich's HR2977. There is nothing in the UK or EU parliaments. This is not surprising. The spraying of these huge condensation trails at high altitude can be attributed to ordinary aircraft. Unlike the HAARP project, the military does not even have to admit that the programme even exists because there are no visible bases or equipment which would give it away. According to a world expert on the subject Will Thomas of Canada, the public are met with the same response from their governments: these are just ordinary condensation trails or contrails. Besides Kucinich's Bill, which he has back-pedalled on, there is nothing except our own photographic and video evidence of the phenomenon.


However, since the European Parliament and the Russian Parliament believe that the US government is deploying geophysical weapons, the use of chemtrails is for weather modification would certainly seem plausible.


The big give away of chemtrails is their deployment in close formation forming a grid or series of x's across the sky. This can be quite spectacular. At other times a solitary trail will be delivered but last for hours whilst it spreads out.


I recommend watching the documentaries by Clifford E. Carnicom, Aerosol Crimes (available www.carnicom.com) and by Will Thomas, Chemtrails: Mystery Lines in the Sky, (available at www.willthomas.net)



Briefing on Congressman Dennis Kucinich and The Space Preservation Acts


1.107th Congress


HR1160 To terminate operation of the Extremely Low Frequency Communication System of the Navy.


2.107th congress (first session)


HR2977 Space Preservation Act of 2001


3.107th Congress (second session)


HR3616 Space Preservation Act of 2002


4.108th Congress


HR3657 Space Preservation Act of 2003


5.109th Congress


HR2420 Space Preservation Act of 2005


The first Bill HR1160 refers to the use of extremely low frequency communications used by the Navy. However, one of the major areas of interest in active ionospheric research at the HAARP facility is the generation of frequencies below approximately 5 kHz. Kucinich was one of 18 co-sponsors of this Bill.


The second Bill, which was sponsored by Kucinich in October 2001, HR2977, lists all the secret and exotic technologies he learned about via his position on the House Armed Services oversight committee. These include mind and mood control technologies, tectonic weapons (i.e. to generate earthquakes), chemtrails, weather modification and other environmental weapons.


The third, fourth, and fifth Bills sponsored by Kucinich remove all references to exotic technologies. The weaponry referred to is exclusively space-based weaponry, operating at altitudes of above 110km. This would exclude chemtrails delivered by aircraft and HAARP which is land-based although it targets the ionosphere (90-600km). The exotic weapons systems in HR2977 are defined as being land-based and sea-based as well as space-based.


These amended versions are only opposing President Bush's public shift in space-based weapons policy which was to withdraw from the 30 year old Anti-Ballistic missile Treaty in 2002. The new policy envisages weapons systems that can attack enemy satellites and intercept missiles. These are not secret weapons.


It seems that within four months of drafting HR2977, Kucinich was given a sharp slap on the wrist and warned off debating secret weapons. Interestingly there were no co-sponsors of HR2977 but there are many co-sponsors of the subsequent sanitized versions.


I have not been able to find any records of Kucinich publicly commenting on exotic weapons after HR2977.



Briefing on HAARP and the US Congress


I couldn't find anything on HAARP in the US Congress website thomas.loc.gov other than Kucinich's Bills. There are references to HAARP in various defence appropriations Bills.


However, Dr Nick Begich has an article on his website entitled Star Wars, Star Trek and Killing Politely which references comments by the US Secretary of Defense, William Cohen. In 1997, in a news briefing, Cohen said:


Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves (1)


(1)Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, Department of Defense News Briefing, Secretary of Defense William Cohen, April 28, 1997. Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy at the Georgia Center, Mahler Auditorium, University of Georgia, Athens, Ga.
http://www.earthpulse.com/haarp/starwars.html



Briefing on the European Parliament resolution on HAARP


The driver behind international concerns about HAARP is Dr. Nick Begich from Alaska. He wrote the book Angels Don't Play This HAARP:Advances in Tesla Technology, which is 230 pages of detailed information, in 1995.


His article On the Trail Towards New Science attached, recounts his attendance at a public hearing of the European Parliament 5th February 1998. His principal contact was Tom Spencer, the Conservative MEP who chaired the Foreign Affairs Committee. I attach the notes from that committee meeting from the EU website. Entitled Background Information 09-02-98 The HAARP Project and non-lethal weapons, it is worth reading in its entirety. Tom Spencer invited the Americans to attend to discuss HAARP, but they declined. Dr Begich and Dr Rosalie Bertell described how HAARP could be used as a weapon to,


disrupt electronic communications worldwide by acting upon the ionosphere
cause earthquakes and tidal waves
deprive areas of the world of water through weather modification.


Unfortunately, the procedures of the European Union do not require such meetings to be minuted. This information is merely a summary of what was discussed.


I attach some background information on Tom Spencer. He left politics in 1999, but it seems that he is a very prominent environmentalist. The information was take from his personal website.


The hearing contributed to the report written by Swedish MEP Maj Britt Theorin for the Foreign Affairs Committee entitled Report on the environment, security and foreign policy A4-0005/99. It was published 14th January 1999 after it received an endorsement or "opinion" from the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection.


I attach an edited version of this report which includes only the relevant passages on HAARP and non-lethal weapons.


The report includes a motion for a resolution by the European Parliament, an explanatory statement, and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment.


The resolution requested


that an independent panel of scientific experts scrutinize the legal, ethical and ecological impact of HAARP
that the Scientific and Technological Options Assessment (STOA) Panel of the European Union assess the impact of HAARP
that the European Commission and the governments of Sweden, Finland, Norway and the Russian Federation examine the environmental and public health implications of the HAARP programme for Arctic Europe and to report back to Parliament with its findings.
an international ban on chemical, electrical and sound weapons which can manipulate the human brain.


The passage on HAARP in the explanatory statement is entitled HAARP - a weapons system which disrupts the climate. It describes HAARP as a weapon that can


heat up the ionosphere and focus large amounts of energy on a particular area by creating artificial lenses
serve as an anti-missile system by focusing electrical energy on a moving target
allow better communications with submarines
disrupt global communications
manipulate global weather patterns
penetrate the earth for the purposes of tomography (ie x-raying and mapping the earth).


The Opinion of the Committee on the Environment was that


HAARP was a serious threat to global environment and human health
the European Commission should urge the US, Russia and all other countries involved with these type of weapons to desist, and to devise and international treaty to ban them.
there should be an international ban on chemical, electrical and sound weapons weapons that can manipulate the human brain.


In response to this report, the European Parliament passed a resolution on the environment, security, and foreign policy on 28 January 1999. I attach an edited version.


The Parliament,


regards HAARP, by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment, to be a global concern and calls for its legal,ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body.
Regrets the refusal of the US to send any representatives to the public hearing.
Requests the Scientific and Technological Options Assessment (STOA) Panel to examine HAARP.
Calls on the Commission to examine if there are environmental and public health implications of the HAARP programme for Arctic Europe and to report back to Parliament with its finding.
Calls for an international convention introducing a global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human being.


European Parliamentary Questions


On 28 April 2003, Hiltrud Breyer (MEP) put a written question (E-1453/03) to the Commission asking what progress it had made on the resolution passed four years earlier. Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission replied on 3 July 2003, that,


The High frequency Active Auroral Research Programme (HAARP) for Arctic Europe is a military programme. The Commission has no competence, nor indeed the expertise, to carry out the examination requested by the Parliament in paragraph 26 of its Resolution.


On 29 April 2004, Paul Lannoye (MEP) put the same question to the Commission, but there has been no reply. Apparently the question has "lapsed" under rule 185. I do not understand what this means.


This is the latest information I have been able to find on the website of the European Union.



Briefing on HAARP and the UK Parliament


I have searched the UK Parliament website, which includes Hansard, and have found one MP who raised the issue. On 17th October 2002, Paul Flynn MP for Newport West, raised the subject of HAARP during a Commons debate on defence. He pointed out that HAARP boils the ionosphere and that there might be terrible weapons that we are not aware of. On 21st October 2002 he put a Parliamentary question to the Secretary of State for Defence, Dr. Moonie:


Paul Flynn: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment has been made of the HAARP programme; and what contribution Britain is making to it.


Dr. Moonie: The Ministry of Defence is fully aware of the HAARP project. However the MOD has made no specific assessment of the project for defence purposes nor has it contributed towards it.


Paul Flynn MP has an article on his website which I attach. The article summarizes the book by Dr. Begich, Angels Don't Play this HAARP.


It concludes with the statements of the Russian Parliament which called upon President Putin to press the US to abandon the HAARP programme. The Duma also said that there are two other stations in Greenland and Norway which could be used in conjunction with HAARP. The one in Norway is called the EISCAT (European Incoherent Scatter) which is jointly funded by research councils of Norway, Sweden, Finland, Japan, France, the United Kingdom and Germany.





Additonal Information on HAARP and Mind Control


Extracts from chapters 22 and 23 of Angels Don't Play this HAARP,
by Dr. Nick Begich www.earthpulse.com


"The predominant brain wave frequencies indicate the kind of activity taking place in the brain. There are four basic groups of brain wave frequencies which are associated with most mental activity. The first, beta waves, (13-25 hertz of pulses per second) are associated with normal activity when a person's attention is directed outward, toward normal activities. The high end of this range is associated with stress or agitated states which can impair thinking and reasoning skills. The second group, alpha waves (8-12 hertz), can indicate relaxation. Alpha frequencies are ideal for learning and focused mental functioning. The third, theta waves (4-7 hertz), indicate mental imagery, access to memories and internal mental focus. This state is often associated with young children, behavioural modification and sleep/dream states. The last, ultra slow, delta waves (0.5-3 hertz) are found when a person is in deep sleep. The general rule is that the brain's predominant wave frequency will be lowest, in terms of pulses per second, when relaxed, and highest when people are most alert or agitated.


"External stimulation of the brain by electromagnetic means can cause the brain to be entrained or locked into phase with an external signal generator. Predominant brain waves can be driven or pushed into new frequency patterns by external stimulation. .....


"In combination with specific wave forms the various frequencies trigger precise chemical responses in the brain. The release of these neurochemicals cause specific reactions in the brain which result in feelings of fear, lust, depression, love, etc. All of these, and the full range of emotional/intellectual responses, are caused by very specfic combinations of these brain chemicals which are released by frequency-specific electrical impulses. ..... The work in this area is advancing at a rapid rate with new discoveries being made regularly. Unlocking the knowledge of these specific frequencies will yield significant break-throughs in understanding human health. Radio frequency radiation, acting as a carrier for extremely low frequencies (ELF), can be used to wirelessly entrain brain waves. This is what HAARP could do in certain of its applications; however, the side effects of this on humans are not explored in the HAARP records but do appear in other government documents referred to in this book. .....


".... The power levels to achieve a measure of control of brain activity is very small- from 5 to 200 microamperes- which is thousands of times less than the power required to run a 60-watt lightbulb. We are talking about very, very low power requirements. The trick for influencing brain activity is in the combination of frequency, power level and wave form. What has taken place over the last two decades, and most particularly in the last several years, represent huge moves forward. ....


".... According to HAARP records, when the device is built to full power it can send VLF and ELF waves using many wave forms at energy levels sufficient to affect entire populations.


" Dr Jose M. R. Delgado, M.D., has researched the human brain and published his results in professional papers since 1952. .... He found than by inducing electrical current in the brain of his subject, he could manipulate behaviour. Delgado discovered that he could create a number of effects from sleep to highly agitated states of consciousness. His later work was done wirelessly, with his most advanced efforts developed without electrode implants used at all. ....


".... John Heckscher, HAARP program manager, made clear in an interview that the frequencies and energies used in HAARP were controllable and in some applications would be pulsed in the 1-20 hertz range. ....


".... The HAARP system creates a huge coherent controllable electromagnetic field which could be compared to a Delgado EMF, except HAARP'S doesn't fill a room, it potentially fills a region the size of a large western state and possibly, a hemisphere. Basically, the HAARP transmitter in this application will emit energy of the same level of the Earth's, which is fifty times more than what was needed in the wireless experiments of Delgado. What this means is that if HAARP is tuned to the right frequency, using just the right wave forms, mental disruption throughout a region could occur intentionally or as a side effect of the transmissions. "



Further applications of HAARP described by Begich


Cyclotron resonance


HAARP can have significant effects on living cells, causing chemical reactions and physiological responses. This concept has been explored by the US Naval Medical Research Center. They found that resonant frequencies could enhance the biological effects of naturally occurring chemicals, thereby creating the same reaction as if a drug had been administered. The military application of this would be to administer a tiny amount of a toxic substance on the battlefield and then enhance its effect with resonant frequencies. This technique is clearly described in US Air Force documents, but it is not disclosed in any of the documents associated with the HAARP project.


The same technique can be used to heal diseases or create them. Delgado conducted experiments to heal bone fractures, induce genetic deformations, and alter the immune system. These effects can be achieved with very small amounts of controlled power.