FAIR USE NOTICE

FAIR USE NOTICE: The information and materials used on this blog, i.e. articles, videos,etc., may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, spiritual, religious, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: /http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode

Wednesday, October 21, 2020

    

AMERICA'S FRONTLINE DOCTORS SUMMIT 2020

DAY 1, MORNING SESSION

The afternoon session of day 1 of this Summit can be seen here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/AIzCcfKU42oK/
The Capital Hill Press Conference held the following day can be seen here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/0rIIAs9UCMV6/

Timeline and Speakers  

Morning Session
0:00:00 Dr. Simone Gold: Introduction with a reading from the Institute of Virology
0:02:25 Dr. Robert Hamilton: The Effect of C19 on Children and How It Implicates School Policies
0:28:35 Dr. Jeffery Bark: Schools
0:43:00 Dr. Mark McDonald: Psychiatric Effects on Children and Adolescents During Lock Down
0:52:40 Dr. Teryn Clarke: Addressing the Healthy Older Population
1:05:05 Dr. Erickson: The Impacts of the Lock Down on Society In General
1:31:00 Dr. Armstrong: Addressing the Frail Older Population
2:05:20 Dr. Richard Urso: censorship
2:12:30 Dr. James Todaro - censorship
2:16:30 Dr. Erickson - censorship
2:19:00 Dr. Joseph Lodapo - policy perspectives
2:44:30 Dr. Scott Jenssen - The Effect on Doctors Caused by Censorship
end


AMERICA'S FRONTLINE DOCTORS SUMMIT 2020 - DAY 1, AFTERNOON SESSION


Timeline and Speakers
0:00:00 Jenny Beth Martin and Dr. Simone Gold: Introduction
0:02:10 Dr. Richard Urso - the history of CV19
0:02:53 Dr. Mobeen Syed - The Mechanism of Action of HCQ
0:14:38 Dr. Richard Urso - the history of HCQ
0:20:10 Dr. Simone Gold - the safety of HCQ
0:02:57 Dr. Stella Immanuel - the continued use of HCQ in a clinical environment
0:36:17 Dr. Simone Gold - data on HCQ from 24 countries including China, France, India, Brazil, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the U.S. (NYC and Detroit), positive studies starting from FEBRUARY 2020.
0:39:12 Dr. Geoff Mitchell - Best Outcomes in the C19 Pandemic
0:59:03 Dr. Richard Urso - What have America's Frontline Doctors Learned?
1:02:10 Dr. Simone Gold - The Problems Created by Fear and the MSM Narrative
1:04:06 Dr. Scott Barbour - The HCQ Hoaxes Being Spread
1:38:00 Dr. James Todaro - The Deception Promoted by the MSM and BigPharma
1:56:25 Dr. Richard Urso - Intentional Disinformation Being Spread by Organizations
2:00:20 Dr. Stella Immanuel - An Appeal for the Truth on HCQ
2:06:30 Dr. Susanna Dokupil / Steve Mitby - Legal Options for Doctors Experience Resistance to Their Practice
2:34:37 Dr. Richard Urso - Wrapping up the Summit
2:36:52 Dr. Stella Immanuel - Final Word: The Spiritual Battle Going On
2:41:05 Prayer led by Dr. Stella Immanuel
2:42:46 Feedback from and Questions Raised by Doctors Across the Country Concerning Events Surrounding the Spread of C19

Sunday, October 11, 2020

Masks Don’t Work: A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19 Social Policy


Click the links below to read the articles. The second link is an update on the first article.  If the links don't work , then copy the address below the link and paste it into the address bar. In which case I am sorry for the inconvenience. I still have not figured out the formatting on this new blogger page setup that has been forced on me. I am not very tech savvy.


Masks Don’t Work: A Review of Science Relevant to COVID-19 Social Policy

https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy



Still No Conclusive Evidence Justifying Mandatory Masks 

https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/still-no-conclusive-evidence-justifying-mandatory-masks

Thursday, October 1, 2020

Comment on Praying Medic video about condemning White Supremacists and Proud Boys

 

My comment on Praying Medic video about condemning white supremacists and Proud Boys:

Praying Medic News - September 30, 2020

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLXGD7npEHM

Proud Boys are Not White Supremacists. And they have black and white members. Praying Medic, it almost sounds like you have succumbed to the 'politically correct' definitions of these terms . They constantly label people and groups as white supremacists and racists,, when they are not, and then treat the labels as facts . The same goes for the 'hate speech ' label . When Chris WALLACE ASKED Trump TO DENOUNCE THE WHITE SUPREMACISTS, HE also LUMPED IN ' AND MILITIA GROUPS' AND THEN LATER THE PROUD BOYS... That is a loaded statement/question. You cannot lump all those together and then expect Trump to say , 'Yes, I condemn them.' Militia groups are legal and and constitutional and they only came out to protect their own neighborhoods when the cops had to stand down and then only sometimes after watching businesses looted and burned and people hurt and killed. The left would like militia groups to be condemned because , though they are calling to defund the police, they do not want us to have a different option to protect ourselves. Militias cannot be lumped in with the violent groups as if they are the same thing happening on both sides. They definitely are not the same thing. Neither are the Proud Boys the same thing. They are coming to protect us from the violence instead of letting it happen unopposed. If they won't let the police protect us then we must protect ourselves. And it the right thing to do. And it is a right. Chris did the same thing with critical race theory . He equated that with racial sensitivity. Critical Race Theory is a false and destructive ideology. It is NOT racial sensitivity. We cannot let them get away with all the wrong definitions and wrong conclusions they pose in those questions as if they are undisputed facts. You seemed to be ignoring those things when you said you wished President trump would have clearly denounced white supremacy . etc. That is silent acquiescence to all those false definitions, conclusions and ideologies inferred in those questions.


I amended the comment for a different video:
Proud Boys are Not White Supremacists. And they have black and white members. I agree with you for as you go But I want to comment on Chris's loaded question/demand using common gotcha tactics of the left. .The left constantly labels people and groups as 'white supremacists' and racists,, when they are not, Then they treat these labels as facts and as if no one would dispute these facts. The same goes for the 'hate speech ' label. When Chris WALLACE asked Trump to denounce the White Supremacists he also lumped in militia groups and then after that, the Proud Boys. That is a loaded question. You cannot lump all those together as if they are all the same and then expect Trump to say , 'Yes, I condemn them'. Militia groups are legal and constitutional and they only came out to protect their own neighborhoods when the cops had to stand down and then only sometimes after watching businesses looted and burned and people hurt and killed.. The left would like militia groups to be condemned because , though they are calling to defund the police, they do not want us to have a different option to protect ourselves. Militias cannot be lumped in with the violent groups as if they are the same thing happening on both sides. They definitely are not the same thing. Neither are the Proud Boys the same thing. They are coming to protect us from the violence instead of letting it happen unopposed. If they won't let the police protect us then we must protect ourselves. And it the right thing to do. And it is a right. Chris did the same thing with critical race theory . He equated that with 'racial sensitivity.' Critical Race Theory is a false and destructive ideology. It is a Johnny come lately untried and unproven social theory.. it is only VERY loosely based on 'critical theory' and for the most part, it is made up and not scientific at all. It is NOT 'racial sensitivity.' We cannot let them get away with all the wrong definitions and wrong conclusions and false ideologies thar are inferred in those questions as if they are undisputed facts. We need to start calling them out and making the distinctions before we answer or comment when they do that