Tuesday, December 29, 2020
Monday, December 28, 2020
Wednesday, December 23, 2020
The Perfect Storm : Election 2008
The Perfect Storm : Election 2008
http://www.gulfcoastnews.com/GCNarchive/2008/GCNanalysisSidebarPerfectStorm.htm
 GCN Analysis The Perfect Storm : Election 2008 Sidebar Timeline from Obama’s Birth to Popular Election As · Obama’s mother, 18 year old Ann Dunham, married to Obama Sr. February 2, 1961 and traveled to Kenya very pregnant with the infant we know today as Barack, but has also been called Barry. · Dunham, either finding out that her husband had another wife, or not liking the way Muslim men treat their wives, or possibly both, decides to return to her parents in Hawaii. According to Berg, the airlines will not permit her to board a plane as her delivery is imminent. · Dunham gives birth to a son in Mombassa, Kenya, August 4, 1961. · Dunham returns to Hawaii and according to Berg registers the birth August 8, 1961. · A newspaper clip birth announcement is extant from August 13, 1961. · Ann Dunham divorces Obama and later meets and marries Indonesian citizen Lolo Soetoro. · Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro and young Barry move to Jakarta, Indonesia with husband Lolo sometime in 1967. As the nation is undergoing great strife, only citizens may attend state schools. According to Berg, Lolo either adopts or otherwise certifies Barry as his child thus making Obama a “natural Indonesian citizen.” School records show Obama as Barry Soetoro and his religion as Muslim. · Barry Soetoro returns to Hawaii alone to live with his maternal grandparents in 1971. He attends the private Punahou School 5th through 12th grade. According to Berg, Dunham never takes the steps to repatriate Barry as a U.S. citizen. · After graduation from Punahou, Barry Obama goes off to attend Occidental College in Los Angles, California before transferring to Columbia University in New York. He will later attend Harvard Law School. Because Columbia and Harvard will not honor Berg’s Federal subpoenas, it is thought that by Berg and others that Obama may have possibly attended on a foreign scholarship as an Indonesian national. · Obama’s undergraduate work is in political science with a specialization in international relations. · Barry returns home from college on break and announces that he would like to be known hereafter as “Barack.” · Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981 with Pakistani friends at a time when Pakistan allegedly would not permit entry by U.S. citizens. Obama is alleged by Berg to have entered Pakistan with his Indonesian passport. · After graduation from Columbia, Obama works in New York for four years first for Business International Corporation, persistently reported as a CIA front organization because of its business role of researching international economics and politics. Obama then shifts to the New York Interest Research Group, a non-profit student run political organization not associated with Columbia University. · Obama subsequently relocates to Chicago to be the director for The Developing Communities Project working in the city’s far south side. Additionally, Obama did consulting and instructional work for the Gamaliel Foundation, a community organizing group inspired by and built on the ideas of the famous radical, and self-styled “professional” community organizer, Saul Alinsky. If one just scans the top ten quotes attributed to Saul Alinsky, one sees the entire design of the present Democrat political machine and the reason why someone like McCain is helpless before it. To defeat it one must counter-attack it but in very clever ways that prevent them from assuming a sympathetic “victim” status. They are not above infiltrating your ranks for the sole purpose of having one embarrass you. To them there is no honor. To them, winning is everything, and they will never give up. All of the “community organizers” are patterned after Alinsky. One of their hallmarks is to be paid for their revolutionary services, so be astute to follow the money trail. · Obama attends Harvard Law School where he was also selected as first, black editor, and later, black president of the Harvard Law Review, graduating in 1991. · During his law school summers, Obama worked first for the Chicago law firm of Sidley & Austin and later Hopkins & Sutter. · After graduation, Obama returned to Chicago where The University of Chicago offered him a book writing fellowship as part of his recruitment package to teach constitutional law. · The book, Dreams of My Father was to take one year to write. When either a manuscript didn’t materialize, or a manuscript of sufficient quality was not produced, some believe William Ayres may have ghost written the book for him. · The official line is that Dreams was written over several months in 1995 in Bali where Obama and his wife Michelle retired for just that purpose. · While Obama waited to begin teaching at the University of Chicago, he directed Illinois chapter of Project Vote, an ACORN type organization targeting African Americans founded by Left-Wing lawyer Sandy Newman. · In 1993, Obama joined civil rights law firm Davis, Minor, Barnhill, and Galland. · Obama’s law license became inactive in 2002. According to Berg, Obama’s Illinois BAR application stated that he had never used another name other than Barack Hussein Obama, an outright lie as he, again according to Berg, has gone by the following names: Barack Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama, Barry Dunham, and Barack Dunham. · Also in 1992, Obama was a founding member of Public Allies board of directors, supposedly resigning before his wife, Michelle, became the founding director for Public Allies Chicago. Public Allies is a taxpayer supported Left wing nonprofit organization with a nebulous “Our mission is to advance new leadership to strengthen communities, nonprofits and civic participation” statement. · From 1994 until 2002 served on the board of directors of the Joyce Foundation, another hard Left “charitable” organization that funds a broad range of programs from educational and training for low income workers to research to reduce gun ownership including the funding of anti-gun groups. · Obama served from 1995 to 2002 on the board of directors, and 1995 to 1999 as founding president and chairman of the board of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, an organization co-authored by William Ayers of Weathermen fame- by then associate professor of education at the University of Illinois at Chicago, Anne Hallett, executive director of the Cross Cities Project, and Warren Chapman, senior program officer for education at the Joyce Foundation. · Annenberg Challenge has a connection to Newton Minow of Sidley & Austin, one of the firms Obama worked during his summers while in law school. · Obama served on the board of directors from 1993 to 2002 for the Woods Fund of Chicago, a philanthropic organization that was the first to fund the Developing Communities Project, the organization that first brought Obama to Chicago. · 1993 National Voter Registration Act also known as Motor Voter signed into law by President Clinton. As we have seen, the Chicago community of professional radicals had formed an amazingly well interlocked, if not incestuous network of organizations. They served on each other’s boards and saw to it that public and private money was spread around. They also looked to growing new leadership from the grassroots level.
----------------------------------------------------------
By Perry Hicks- Special to GulfCoastNews.com 11/08/08 To borrow a sports metaphor, given all of the assets and advantages available to Obama- funds exceeding $630 million, support from Hollywood and the media- and as poorly managed and as comparatively under-funded as McCain’s campaign was, Obama’s victory should have had a far wider points spread. A good portion of the public did not buy into the Obama hype or were otherwise steadfast in their conservatism. What pushed Obama over the top was the final element of the perfect electoral storm, the global financial meltdown. This was sold to the public as being kicked off by the failures of quasi private mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These failures, of course, were blamed on the “failed economic policies of the last eight years:” i.e. President George W. Bush. Of course, nothing could be further from the truth. Anything to do with the banking/financial/insurance sectors is fiendishly complicated and to simplistically lay blame on Bush could be expected to be false on face value. The present mess is global and is borne of multiple interlocking factors including the inability for western nations to create sufficient wealth to support the welfare states to which they have evolved. The current crop of banking failures had actually begun to be seen in the Germany as early as August 2007 although the seeds for the coming crisis was sown all the way back in 1980 under Democrat President Jimmy Carter with the Depository Institution Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980. Just as the bursting Swiss housing valuation bubble followed with a mortgage banking crisis, the crash in American housing values also resulted in mortgage banking failures. The difference was that the American real estate valuation crisis had global reach. However, in GCN’s view, real estate was not the sole factor bringing down the financial sector; the root cause was the valuation of the dollar. Back in 1980, then Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, Paul Volcker, was faced with having to support the value of a floating dollar that garnered little confidence on the global market. America was in the aftermath of a humiliating but self-imposed defeat in Vietnam, two Arab oil embargos, and the Iranian hostage crisis that would ultimately extend out 444 days. A U.S. military rescue attempt had ended in fiery failure in the Iranian desert just a few months prior. Investors were storing their wealth not in paper, such as securities, but in metal, such as gold, driving the market price of gold up into the hundreds of dollars. This left businesses starving for capital and so forcing them to raise prices even in the face of falling demand (stagflation.) Volker forced the investors out of the gold market by making paper securities more attractive by restricting the supply of money thus driving up the prime lending rate to as high as 21% at its peak. The result was that not only was the value of the dollar increased, dollars came out of gold and into the stock and real estate markets and interest rates fell. However, before the economy could rebound, the entire country outside of the petroleum industry was in a deep recession with unemployment in the double digits. This high unemployment along with the Iranian hostage crisis literally opened the White House door to the election of Republican Ronald Reagan. As the economy took off under Reagan, workers put money into the still new Carter era 401K retirement accounts and the stock market soared and both businesses and individuals suddenly had access to affordable loans. Coupled with Reagan’s lower tax rates, the Reagan Recovery was on. It wasn’t until 1992 that another recession came on the scene. However, coincident with the arrival of President Bill Clinton was the advent of the World Wide Web and the next economic prime mover, the dot coms. The 1990s fueled much of the artificial prosperity of the go-go ‘90s. It wasn’t until the arrival of President George W. Bush that the dot com bubble burst along with the terror attack of September 11, 2001. Since then, the American economy has been sustained by the War on Terror, a war winding down just as the election of 2008 approached. Current U.S. Prosperity Decline Due to Liberal Policies America’s current struggle for prosperity may be laid at the feet of post modern liberal policies. Because increased regulation, notably labor and environment, America’s centers of industrial production have been largely dismantled and figuratively, if not literally, shipped overseas. This has forced American consumers to buy most of their needs from Asian providers, notably China, who have amassed enormous numbers of U.S. dollars. With little more to purchase with them but oil and America itself, the price of both skyrocketed. This also led to the devaluation of the dollar, a problem that will be exacerbated by the recent financial bailout and follow up legislation. These bills promised nearly 2 trillion dollars that will be provided by the combination of simple U.S. Treasury money creation and a massive level of borrowing from foreign nations, notably China. The fundamental business climate the U.S. financial markets struggled with has been:
With pressure to continuously increase investor yields in an environment where basically building wealth is not permitted, financial units increasingly turned to internal investment “products” that were based upon repackaging and derivatives. To say the least, this was a recipe for disaster. The upward valuations of investor 401Ks, institutional portfolios, and other accounts were literally based upon nothing. And when the underlying bubble burst, the collapse of these various funds came like the fall of a line of dominos stretching around the world. Further exacerbating the situation was the lack of oversight applied to the core institutions, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Frank made numerous assurances that Fannie Mae was in good shape when in fact it was not. Furthermore, Fannie Mae was pushed to loan more and more money to minorities on terms that ultimately they could not afford. Barney Frank became chairman of the House Financial Services Committee in 2007. Then there is Democrat Chris Dodd (CT-photo right) who is the 4th most heavily funded senator by the financial services Along with Frank, Dodd refused to hear the alarm about Freddie and Fannie when President Bush called for the application of controls on the two in 2003. Indeed, as late as July of this year, Senator Chris Dodd erroneously announced on CNN that it was “inaccurate” to say anything was wrong at Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac at all. But Rep. Maxine Waters (D- CA) could deny anything was wrong with either Freddie or Fannie and in particular praised the leadership of Franklin Raines, then Chairman and CEO of Fannie Mae. Raines as of late served as an advisor to the Obama campaign, a role both Raines and the Obama campaign have denied only after embarrassing revelations of his involvement in the scandal had surfaced. Effect of the Financial Meltdown After the first bailout plan was thwarted by the public’s massive negative reaction, the legislature quickly enacted another far worse one and President Bush rushed to sign it into law. This left a bad taste of lingering resentment in the mouths of a large number of the voting public. As a result, on election day, either not enough voters showed up to support McCain, or not enough center voters were swayed to vote Republican; the public relations offense to blame Republicans for the meltdown may just have stuck. Combined with ballot box stuffing, legitimate get out the vote, the demonizing of Sarah Palin, and the Republican Party/ McCain Campaign failure to expose Obama’s Marxist loyalties, Democrats were successful in convincing the public that the Republicans were at fault for what the Democrats had actually done. All told, it was the perfect political storm. About the Author.....
Contact the Author: arielsquarefour@hotmail.com
|
Radicalism.
nothing short of stellar. She breathed life into a campaign that was up to that point moribund. Without her, McCain’s losses would have been much, much greater.
career seeped in the radical Marxist New Left movement, its intentional undermining of the United States of America via the Cloward-Piven Strategy, and its methodology of infiltration and subversion from within.
stuffing by such actors as ACORN and like organizations had little impact. However, pollsters cannot be certain as to whom they are addressing and there remains a real concern that this election was no more fairly conducted than in previous years. Indeed, it could well have been worse.
Obama has mocked McCain for calling him a socialist when in fact he is far more- a Marxist working within the system he is dedicated to destroy; or in his parlance, “remake.”
Democrat Barney Frank (MA-photo left) 
industry, the one he was supposed to help regulate as chairman of the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee.
Perry HicksThursday, November 19, 2020
Military Use of Silent Sound -- Silent Sound Spread Spectrum
https://www.transformation.dk/www.raven1.net/silsoun2.htm
Quick read for those tight on time
Military Use of Silent Sound
Nexus
Volume 5, Issue 6
October/November 1998
$25/6 issues/ 1 year
1998 Nexus New Times
888-909-7474
nexus@peg.apc.org
--------------------------
EXCERPT: More in magazine.
--------------------------
Military Use of Mind Control Weapons
Judy Wall 1998
PSY-OPS WEAPONRY USED IN THE PERSIAN GULF WAR
See also another article on this site.
For years, rumours have persisted that the United States Department
of Defense has been engaged in research and development of
ultra-sophisticated mind- altering technology. Confirmation of this
came to me recently in the form of two ITV News Bureau Ltd (London)
wire service bulletins.[1]
The March 23, 1991 newsbrief, "High-Tech Psychological Warfare
Arrives in the Middle East", describes a US Psychological
Operations (PsyOps) tactic directed against Iraqi troops in Kuwait
during Operation Desert Storm. The manoeuvre consisted of a system
in which subliminal mind-altering technology was carried on
standard radiofrequency broadcasts. The March 26, 1991 newsbrief
states that among the standard military planning groups in the
centre of US war planning operations at Riyadh was "an unbelievable
and highly classified PsyOps program utilising 'silent sound'
techniques".
The opportunity to use this method occurred when Saddam Hussein's
military command-and-control system was destroyed. The Iraqi troops
were then forced to use commercial FM radio stations to carry
encoded commands, which were broadcast on the 100 MHz frequency.
The US PsyOps team set up its own portable FM transmitter,
utilising the same frequency, in the deserted city of Al Khafji.
This US transmitter overpowered the local Iraqi station. Along with
patriotic and religious music, PsyOps transmitted "vague, confusing
and contradictory military orders and information".
Subliminally, a much more powerful technology was at work: a
sophisticated electronic system to 'speak' directly to the mind of
the listener, to alter and entrain his brainwaves, to manipulate
his brain's electroencephalograph ic (EEG) patterns and
artificially implant negative emotional states-feelings of fear,
anxiety, despair and hopelessness. This subliminal system doesn't
just tell a person to feel an emotion, it makes them feel it; it
implants that emotion in their minds.[2]
I noticed that the ITV wire service was from outside the United
States. Readers of Resonance may recall that in the
Electromagnetic Weapons Timeline in issue no. 29, reference is made
to the documentary video, Waco: The Big Lie Continues, which
contained video footage of three EM weapons. This segment of the
film was from the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). I
wondered if there was any significance to this.
At the library I pulled up back issues of my local newspaper for
the same time-period of the Gulf War to see what the American wire
services had said, if anything, about the use of this special
PsyOps weapon. There was nothing said about it directly, but three
news articles seemed related. In a news release from Associated
Press during the same timeframe of the Gulf War truce, I read:
"The American pilot who shot down the second Iraqi warplane in 48
hours said Friday that continued Iraqi flights suggested that US
warnings were not filtering down to Iraqi pilots… He said he hopes
Saddam gets the message now. 'It's really too bad that these
people have to die for their unwillingness to heed our warnings...
What I really think is, they don't communicate down to the people,'
he said. 'If they have a communications problem, I suggest they fix
it.'"[3]
That may have been coincidence but two earlier news articles, dated
March 1, 1991, apparently have a common origin with the ITV news
bulletin. The first article[4] tells us that approximately 100
members of the US 101st Airborne Division, fluent in Arabic, talked
the enemy into surrendering. These soldiers rode in the Apache
helicopter gunships that were involved in the longest
helicopter-borne assault in history. They told the Iraqi troops
that they would be slaughtered if they didn't give up.
"They got the point," one soldier is quoted as saying.
This all sounds very unremarkable, except when you read the
editor's note: "The following dispatch was subject to US military
censorship." Now why would they want to censor such a mundane
tactic, except out of embarrassment that the US Army fighting
forces had fallen to the level of a cheer-leading squad?
... in which case they would have nixed the thing entirely.
But upon re-reading the article, we may pick out certain key
phrases (emphasised in italics):
"He [the soldier interviewed] was one of dozens of Arabic speakers
that played a key role in the allied ground attack against Iraq,
and part of an attempt by the US Army to use finesse, intelligence
work and tactics to complement brute strength."
If we fill in the missing blanks with such descriptions as "the
megaphone was used to direct psychoacoustic frequencies that
engaged the neural networks of the enemy's brain, causing him to
think any thought and feel any emotion that the Americans chose to
lay on him", then it starts to make sense. And it would no longer
seem so surprising that one soldier could talk 450 enemy soldiers
into surrendering. The possibilities are there, and, as the next
article[5] documents, that is exactly what happened. Iraqi troops
gave up en masse.
We quote: "They were surrendering in droves, almost too fast for us
to keep up with..."; "...two Iraqi majors, both brigade commanders,
who gave up their entire units..."; and "...one of them gave up to
an RPV [remotely piloted vehicle). Here's this guy with his hands
up, turning in a circle to give himself up to a model airplane with
a camera in it."
Irrational? Not if there was also a voice being beamed into his
head from that little flying toy, saying, "Give up, give up!"
Otherwise, how do we account for the editor's note at the beginning
of the article: "The following is based on pool dispatches that
were subject to military censorship." Without that note, we could
smugly think that the Iraqi soldiers were cowards or crazy, but why
censor that idea?
MIND CONTROL WITH SILENT SOUNDS
The mind-altering mechanism is based on a subliminal carrier
technology: the Silent Sound Spread Spectrum (SSSS), sometimes
called "S-quad" or "Squad". It was developed by Dr Oliver Lowery of
Norcross, Georgia, and is described in US Patent #5,159,703,
"Silent Subliminal Presentation System", dated October 27, 1992.
The abstract for the patent reads:
"A silent communications system in which nonaural carriers, in the
very low or very high audio-frequency range or in the adjacent
ultrasonic frequency spectrum are amplitude- or frequency-modulated
with the desired intelligence and propagated acoustically or
vibrationally, for inducement into the brain, typically through the
use of loudspeakers, earphones, or piezoelectric transducers. The
modulated carriers may be transmitted directly in real time or may
be conveniently recorded and stored on mechanical, magnetic, or
optical media for delayed or repeated transmission to the
listener."
According to literature by Silent Sounds, Inc., it is now possible,
using supercomputers, to analyse human emotional EEG patterns and
replicate them, then store these "emotion signature clusters" on
another computer and, at will, "silently induce and change the
emotional state in a human being".
Silent Sounds, Inc. states that it is interested only in positive
emotions, but the military is not so limited. That this is a US
Department of Defense project is obvious.
Edward Tilton, President of Silent Sounds, Inc., says this about
S-quad in a letter dated December 13, 1996:
"All schematics, however, have been classified by the US Government
and we are not allowed to reveal the exact details... ... we make
tapes and CDs for the German Government, even the former Soviet
Union countries! All with the permission of the US State
Department, of course... The system was used throughout Operation
Desert Storm (Iraq) quite successfully."
The graphic illustration, "Induced Alpha to Theta Biofeedback
Cluster Movement", which accompanies the literature, is labelled
#AB 116-394-95 UNCLASSIFIED" and is an output from "the world's
most versatile and most sensitive electroencephalograph (EEG)
machine". It has a gain capability of 200,000, as compared to other
EEG machines in use which have gain capability of approximately
50,000. It is software-driven by the "fastest of computers" using a
noisenulling technology similar to that used by nuclear submarines
for detecting small objects underwater at extreme range.[6]
The purpose of all this high technology is to plot and display a
moving cluster of periodic brainwave signals. The illustration
shows an EEG display from a single individual, taken of left and
right hemispheres simultaneously. Ile readout from the two sides
of the brain appear to be quite different, but in fact are the same
(discounting normal leftright brain variations).
CLONING THE EMOTIONS
By using these computer-enhanced EEGs, scientists can identify and
isolate the brain's low-amplitude "emotion signature clusters",
synthesise them and store them on another computer. In other words,
by studying the subtle characteristic brainwave patterns that occur
when a subject experiences a particular emotion, scientists have
been able to identify the concomitant brainwave pattern and can now
duplicate it. "These clusters are then placed on the Silent
Sound[TM] carrier frequencies and will silently trigger the
occurrence of the same basic emotion in another human being!"
SYSTEM DELIVERY AND APPLICATIONS
There is a lot more involved here than a simple subliminal sound
system. There are numerous patented technologies which can be
piggybacked individually or collectively onto a carrier frequency
to elicit all kinds of effects.
There appear to be two methods of delivery with the system. One is
direct microwave induction into the brain of the subject, limited
to short-range operations. The other, as described above, utilises
ordinary radio and television carrier frequencies.
Far from necessarily being used as a weapon against a person, the
system does have limitless positive applications. However, the fact
that the sounds are subliminal makes them virtually undetectable
and possibly dangerous to the general public.
In more conventional use, the Silent Sounds Subliminal System might
utilise voice commands, e.g., as an adjunct to security systems.
Beneath the musical broadcast that you hear in stores and shopping
malls may be a hidden message which exhorts against shoplifting.
And while voice commands alone are powerful, when the subliminal
presentation system carries cloned emotional signatures, the result
is overwhelming.
Free-market uses for this technology are the common self-help
tapes; positive affirmation, relaxation and meditation tapes; as
well as methods to increase learning capabilities.
In a medical context, these systems can be used to great advantage
to treat psychiatric and psychosomatic problems. As a system for
remediating the profoundly deaf, it is unequalled. (Promises,
promises. This is the most common positive use touted for this
technology over the past 30 years. But the deaf are still deaf, and
the military now has a weapon to use on unsuspecting people with
perfectly normal hearing.)
OFFICIAL DENIALS
In fact, the US Government has denied or refused to comment on
mindaltering weapons for years. Only last year, US News & World
Report ran an article titled "Wonder Weapons"basically a review of
the new so-called 'non-lethal' or 'less-than -lethal' weapons.' Not
one word about S-quad, although the technology had been used six
years earlier!
Excerpts from the article read:
"Says Charles Bernard, a former Navy weapons-research director: 'I
have yet to see one of these ray-gun things that actually works…";
and
DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) has come to us
every few years to see if there are ways to incapacitate the
central nervous system remotely,' Dr F. Terry Hambrecht, head of
the Neural Prostheses Program at NIH, told US News, 'but nothing
has ever come of if,' he said. 'That is too science-fiction and
far-fetched."'
It may sound "science fiction and far-fetched" but it is not.
However, that is just what the powers-that-be want you to believe,
so as to leave them alone in their relentless pursuit of...what?
The idea behind non-lethal weapons is to incapacitate the enemy
without actually killing them, or, in the case of riot control or
hostage situations, to disable the participants without permanent
injury, preferably without their knowing it. The electromagnetic
mind-altering technologies would all fall into this class of
weapons, but since they are all officially non-existent, who is to
decide when and where they will be used?
And why should selected companies in the entertainment industry
reportedly be allowed access to this technology when the very fact
of its existence is denied to the general public?
As recently as last month [February], this stonewall approach of
total denial or silence on the subject still held fast, even toward
committees of the US Congress!
- The Joint Economics Committee, chaired by Jim Saxton (R-NJ),
convened on February 25, 1998 for the "Hearing on Radio Frequency
Weapons and Proliferation: Potential Impact on the Economy".
Invited testimony included statements by several authorities from
the military:
- Dr Alan Kehs, of the US Army Laboratories, discussed the overall
RF threat.
- Mr James O'Bryon, Deputy Director of Operational Testing and
Director of live fire testing for the Office of Secretary of
Defense at the Pentagon, discussed the role of Live Fire Testing
and how it plays a role in testing military equipment with RF
weapons.
- Mr David Schriner, Principal Engineer of Directed Energy Studies
with Electronic Warfare Associates and recently retired as an
engineer with a naval weapons testing facility, talked about the
difficulty in building an RF weapon and about the terrorist threat.
- Dr Ira Merritt, Chief of Concepts Identification and Applications
Analysis Division, Advanced Technology Directorate, Missile Defense
and Space Technology Center, Huntsville, Alabama, discussed the
proliferation of RF weapons primarily from the former Soviet Union.
Although these statements gave information of technical interest,
they are perhaps more important for the information they did not
give: information on the existence of radiofrequency weapons that
directly affect the human brain and nervous system.
KGB PSYCHOTRONICS
This technology did not spring up overnight. It has a long history
of development and denials of development-by the US Government and
probably half of the other governments of the world as well.
We know that the former Soviet Union was actively engaged in this
type of research. In a previous article we reported that during the
1970s the Soviet KGB developed a Psychotronic Influence System
(PIS) that was used to turn soldiers into programmable 'human
weapons'. The system employed a combination of highfrequency
radiowaves and hypnosis. The PIS project was begun in response to a
similar training scheme launched in the US by President Carter,
according to Yuri Malin, former security adviser to USSR President
Gorbachev.[8]
In my Electromagnetic Weapons Timeline[9] I covered a period of 60
years of interest and development in EM weapons—information
gathered from the many articles and news clippings sent in by
readers of Resonance. In my article on synthetic telepathy[10] I
traced the development of the 'voice in your head' technology
dating back to 1961, all my references coming from the open
scientific literature.
POWER OF THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
Jan Wiesemann has written an apt description of the situation which
now exists in the United States, about the 'forces that be' and how
the situation came about:
"During the Cold War the United States not only engaged in a
relatively open nuclear arms race with the Soviet Union, but also
engaged in a secret race developing unconventional weapons. As the
intelligence agencies (which prior to the Second World War had
merely played a supporting role within the government) continued to
increase their power, so did the funds spent on developing
techniques designed to outsmart each other.
"And as the US intelligence community began to grow, a secret
culture sprang about which enabled the intelligence players to
implement the various developed techniques to cleverly circumvent
the democratic processes and institutions...
"Like many other democracies, the US Government is made up of two
basic parts the elected constituency, i.e., the various governors,
judges, congressmen and the President; and the unelected
bureaucracies, as represented by the numerous federal agencies.
"In a well-balanced and correctly functioning democracy, the
elected part of the government is in charge of its unelected
bureaucratic part, giving the people a real voice in the agenda set
by their government.
"While a significant part of the US Government no doubt follows
this democratic principle, a considerable portion of the US
Government operates in complete secrecy and follows its own
unaccountable agenda which, unacknowledged, very often is quite
different from the public agenda. "[11]
Jan goes on to quote one of the United States' most popular war
heroes: Dwight D. Eisenhower, who served as Supreme Commander of
Allied Forces during World War II and was later elected 34th
President of the United States. In his farewell address to the
nation in 1961, President Eisenhower said:
"...we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry
of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men
and women are directly engaged in the defence establishment. We
annually spend on military security more than the net income of all
United States corporations.
"This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large
arms industry is new in the American experience. The total
influence-economic, political, even spiritual-is felt in every
city, every state house, every office of the federal government. We
recognise the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not
fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and
livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our
society.
"In the councils of government, we must guard against the
acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought,
by the military -industrial complex. The potential for the
disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must
never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or
our democratic processes."
INTERNATIONAL CONCERNS OVER NEW WEAPONS
The United Nations was established in 1945 with the aim of "saving
succeeding generations from the scourge of war". In 1975 the
General Assembly considered a draft first proposed by .the Soviet
Union: "Prohibition of the Development and Manufacture of New Types
of Weapons of Mass Destruction and New Systems of Such Weapons".
In 1979 the Soviet Union added a list of some types of potential
weapons of mass destruction:
1) Radiological weapons (using radioactive materials) which could
produce harmful effects similar to those of a nuclear explosion;
2) Particle beam weapons, based on charged or neutral particles, to
affect biological targets;
3) Infrasonic acoustic radiation weapons;
4) Electromagnetic weapons operating at certain radio-frequency
radiations which could have injurious effects on human organs.[12]
In response, the US and other Western nations stalled. They gave a
long, convoluted reason, but the result was the same.
In an article entitled "Non-Lethal Weapons May Violate
Treaties",[13] the author notes that the Certain Conventional
Weapons Convention[14] covers many of the non-conventional
weapons—"those that utilize infrasound or electromagnetic energy
(including lasers, microwave or radiofrequency radiation, or
visible light pulsed at brainwave frequency) for their effects".
Harlan Girard, Managing Director of the International Committee
Against Offensive Microwave Weapons, told me he believes the
strategy behind the government's recent push for less-than-lethal
weapons is a subterfuge. The ones that are now getting all the
publicity are put up for scrutiny to get the public's approval. The
electromagnetic mind-altering technologies are not mentioned, but
would be brought in later under the umbrella of less-than- lethal
weapons.
These weapons were recently transferred from the Department of
Defense over to the Department of Justice. Why? Because there are
several international treaties that specifically limit or exclude
weapons of this nature from being used in international warfare.
In other words, weapons that are barred from use against our
country's worst enemies (notwithstanding the fact that the US did
use this weapon against Iraqi troops!) can now be used against our
own citizens by the local police departments against such groups as
peaceful protestors of US nuclear policies.
TOWARDS GLOBAL MIND CONTROL
The secrecy involved in the development of the electromagnetic
mind-altering technology reflects the tremendous power that is
inherent in it. To put it bluntly, whoever controls this technology
can control the minds of men-all men.
There is evidence that the US Government has plans to extend the
range of this technology to envelop all peoples, all countries.
This can be accomplished, is being accomplished, by utilising the
nearly completed HAARP project[15,16] for overseas areas and the
GWEN network now in place in the US. The US Government denies all
this.
Dr Michael Persinger is a Professor of Psychology and Neuroscience
at Laurentian University, Ontario, Canada. You have met him before
in the pages of Resonance where we reported on his findings that
strong electromagnetic fields can affect a person's brain.
"Temporal lobe stimulation," he said, "can evoke the feeling of a
presence, disorientation, and perceptual irregularities. It can
activate images stored in the subject's memory, including
nightmares and monsters that are normally suppressed."[17]
Dr Persinger wrote an article a few years ago, titled "On the
Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain by
Electromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorithms".[18] The
abstract reads:
"Contemporary neuroscience suggests the existence of fundamental
algorithms by which all sensory transduction is translated into an
intrinsic, brain-specific code. Direct stimulation of these codes
within the human temporal or limbic cortices by applied
electromagnetic patterns may require energy levels which are within
the range of both geomagnetic activity and contemporary
communication networks. A process which is coupled to the narrow
band of brain temperature could allow all normal human brains to
be. affected by a subharmonic whose frequency range at about 10 Hz
would only vary by 0. 1 Hz."
He concludes the article with this:
"Within the last two decades a potential has emerged which was
improbable, but which is now marginally feasible. This potential is
the technical capability to influence directly the major portion of
the approximately six billion brains of the human species, without
mediation through classical sensory modalities, by generating
neural information within a physical medium within which all
members of the species are immersed.
"The historical emergence of such possibilities, which have ranged
from gunpowder to atomic fission, have resulted in major changes in
the social evolution that occurred inordinately quickly after the
implementation. Reduction of the risk of the inappropriate
application of these technologies requires the continued and open
discussion of their realistic feasibility and implications within
the scientific and public domain."
It doesn't get any plainer than that. And we do not have open
discussion because the US Government has totally denied the
existence of this technology.
Acknowledgements
I would like to give special thanks to: Jan Wiesemann for sending
the Silent Sounds[TM] statement and patents which were the keystone
of this article; Mike Coyle, whose computer search turned up many
more related patents; Harlan Girard, who has provided numerous
official government documents; and to the many who have provided
newsclippings and articles, moral and financial support to
Resonance, without which we'd have ceased publication long ago.
About the Author:
Judy Wall is Editor and Publisher of Resonance, the Newsletter of
the Bioelectromagnetics Special Interest Group. pp.11--13,15-16
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)