FAIR USE NOTICE

FAIR USE NOTICE: The information and materials used on this blog, i.e. articles, videos,etc., may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, spiritual, religious, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: /http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode

Monday, January 5, 2015

The Truth About Geoengineering | Foreign Affairs

The Truth About Geoengineering | Foreign Affairs
The Truth About Geoengineering | Foreign Affairs The failure to make much progress at the UN Climate Change Conference in Doha, Qatar this winter was yet another reminder that the world might soon face extreme climate shifts. In response, it is becoming increasingly likely that governments will adopt risky strategies, known as “geoengineering,” to rapidly cool the planet. Four years ago, in order to raise awareness about geoengineering, we published “The Geoengineering Option” in Foreign Affairs. Almost nobody thought that such tactics -- which included spraying particles into the upper atmosphere to make the earth more reflective, akin to how big volcanoes cool the planet -- were a particularly good option. The risks were simply too great and the unknowns too many. Still, if reliable data and specific models showed that climate change was about to get out of hand, we wrote, such drastic measures might start to look more appealing. The world could no longer ignore the geoengineering option, and we argued that a major science program should begin to explore it. These days, barely a month goes by without new research that shows that the planet’s climate could be more sensitive to global warming than experts previously thought. For example, some ice sheets now appear a lot less stable than scientists had imagined. And new estimates of how much the sea will rise when ice sheets melt far surpass the best estimates of just a few years ago. It is clear that, unchecked, climate change won’t just menace natural ecosystems; it will also cause severe harm to humans and could even threaten national security. And, because governments have made barely any progress in controlling the emissions that cause global warming -- the 2000s saw the most rapid growth in emissions of carbon dioxide and other warming gases since the 1970s -- it’s not so crazy to imagine that some nation will launch an emergency geoengineering scheme, perhaps before its viability and consequences are understood. Since we wrote our essay, press coverage of geoengineering has exploded. The topic makes for good copy: it is weird, sexy, and steeped in exotic science. The term is also incredibly vague, including both techniques for removing carbon dioxide from the air and technology that could rapidly change the amount of sunlight reflected back to space and cool the planet. That method is often termed solar radiation management (SRM). Carbon dioxide removal schemes include everything from planting trees to fertilizing the oceans in an attempt to cajole great blooms of phytoplankton. Both hinge on photosynthesis, which sucks carbon dioxide from the air; carbon dioxide is the chief long-term cause of global warming. These techniques also include installing scrubbers almost anywhere on the planet, which can strip carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. Such removal strategies are intriguing, but seem likely to cost hundreds of billions of dollars a year and would take decades to have much of an effect. In contrast, SRM technologies could cool the planet in just a few months by tinkering with the planet’s energy balance. The usual proposals involve spraying material into the stratosphere, where it would turn into reflective clouds, or blowing seawater into the air, with a similar effect. The clouds could deflect just enough incoming sunlight to offset, crudely, the number of degrees human emissions have warmed the planet. Flying a fleet of high-altitude aircraft that spray particles into the upper atmosphere would cost perhaps ten billion dollars per year -- a pittance for a country that is suffering from severe climate change and seeks a quick solution. Most carbon dioxide removal schemes appear relatively safe, although tinkering with a fragile ecosystem by fertilizing the ocean does involve risks. In contrast, SRM raises serious political and policy questions. Although quick and cheap, messing with the complex and imperfectly understood climate system, which is already stressed by warming gases, could end badly. Severe side effects might, for example, include a shift in the seasonal monsoons that many countries rely on for rainfall and agriculture, or accelerate the destruction of the ozone layer. No one knows whether it would be possible to predict and offset all such harmful side effects or how much it might cost. Further, once an SRM system is deployed for an extended period of time, stopping it suddenly would lead to even more rapid and severe climate change as the mask is lifted. Another wrinkle is that some aspects of climate change, such as degraded coral reefs, might be irreversible, and, since the driving forces behind the destruction would remain, it would be particularly irresponsible to deploy SRM without an accompanying program to control carbon emissions. Given the real and imagined dangers, a movement to regulate geoengineering has been gaining momentum. In the fall of 2010, 193 governments adopted a nonbinding decision under the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity that would all but ban testing of geoengineering systems. Most environmental NGOs seem to be opposed to even talking about geoengineering out of fear that it might distract from the urgent task of controlling emissions or encourage governments to go ahead with their own projects. The missing ingredient in all this controversy, though, is arguably the most important: the science. Since 2009, there has been a significant increase in geoengineering research. So far, however, the research is almost exclusively devoted to modeling. It has not yet really moved on to the next stages -- careful monitoring nature’s own geoengineering processes (for example, volcanic eruptions) and small-scale field tests. There has been some limited field work on ocean fertilization, with less than encouraging results. The result is that the scientific community knows little more than it did four years ago about how geoengineering would actually work or what its consequences would be. These technologies might not be well understood when and if they are needed, and could be deployed prematurely. In the growing efforts to regulate geoengineering, governments and activists are flying blind as they conjure up new regulations. Since 2009, several proposals have been made for new SRM research, including by the United Kingdom’s Royal Society, the U.S. Bipartisan Policy Center, and a variety of other scientific groups. Yet funding for serious laboratory, modeling, and field study has not followed, in part because government officials fear the political spotlight that follows this kind of research. Indeed, when White House science adviser John Holdren broached the topic some years ago, he quickly retreated after a blizzard of controversy. Getting started on serious research need not be expensive. When managed correctly, a well-designed scientific research program also needn’t be that controversial if government funders and scientists follow some simple guidelines. Small-scale field trials in the upper atmosphere to test components of an SRM system are particularly urgent. The countries with the leading atmospheric research programs already have the rockets, satellites, and aircraft technologies needed to deploy, instrument, and gather data from tests. For now, research doesn’t even require much new investment, since better knowledge of the upper atmosphere overlaps heavily with broader needs of climate research. The key is to draw a sharp line between studies that are small enough to avoid any noticeable or durable impact on the climate or weather and those that are larger and, accordingly, carry larger risks. (In a recent paper, Ted Parson, a scientist at the Emmett Center for Climate Change and Law, and David Keith, an engineer at Harvard, suggested some reasonable limits.) A smart research program begins with small tests, for example to study whether and how very fine particles in the stratosphere might clump together and how long they will persist. Results would be essential to develop guidelines for larger experiments down the road. Such small-scale tests should not be viewed as the camel's nose under the tent. As the results are analyzed, it is likely that deficiencies of SRM will become more apparent. And the public, far from seeing SRM as a silver bullet, could become yet more concerned about climate change and about the fact that failures to control emissions have made even terribly risky options plausible. In 1891, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes admonished Dr. Watson, "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data." And right now, the politics of geoengineering are far ahead of the science. As the 2010 decision within the Conventional on Biological Diversity shows, fears about geoengineering are leading to counterproductive policy schemes. More practical understanding of what is at stake could help reorient the debate, and if the science is funded and published openly, then best practices and norms for behavior will emerge. In time, those norms and new information will make it easier to focus treaty negotiations -- if they prove necessary at all -- on the aspects of geoengineering that actually need formal intergovernmental regulation. That nations are talking seriously about climate engineering is a sign of just how sick the planet has become. In 2009, we presented geoengineering as an intriguing research project that had potentially profound political consequences. Since then, the politics and public discourse have run quickly, but the research has not. Until the science gets serious, the politics won’t reflect what’s really at stake. Meanwhile, the planet keeps warming and the day when geoengineering might be needed draws nearer. WE the people of the world have noticed these Chemtrails in our skies and the planes flyin g over head for years. I personally have been complaining to our local, state and Federal Government for years too. Our government has denied it and called us "Conspiracy Theorists"! I was happy to see them finally admit it...they need to apologize to us and they need to pay off all of the people's health bills that they created from spraying Aluminium , Barium and Strontium experimenting on this planet earth and destroying lives, plants & trees that need CO-2 to grow and to make photosyntheisis from the Sunlight that they then give off Oxygen so we humans can breathe!!!!! $10 billion dollars wasted and possibly nearly destroyed our OZONE , Shredded our Atmosphere then allowing in more EMG;s from the Sun! How stupid of them ! Rosalie Bertrell Ph.D of the EPA has numerous video's describing the thin layers of our Atmosphere and how they have sprayed tons of aluminum dust into our 3 Atmospheres including the Plasma and that will take billions of years for that to be there and do nothing for human and plant life beneficial.....CO-2 is not our problem , this planet needs CO-2 to live! http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com... To counteract anthropogenic climate change, several schemes have been proposed to diminish solar radiation incident on Earth's surface. These geoengineering schemes could reverse global annual mean warming; however, it is unclear to what extent they would mitigate regional and seasonal climate change, because radiative forcing from greenhouse gases such as CO2 differs from that of sunlight. No previous study has directly addressed this issue. In the NCAR CCM3 atmospheric general circulation model, we reduced the solar luminosity to balance the increased radiative forcing from doubling atmospheric CO2. Our results indicate that geoengineering schemes could markedly diminish regional and seasonal climate change from increased atmospheric CO2, despite differences in radiative forcing patterns. Nevertheless, geoengineering schemes could prove environmentally risky. The Sun is very calm right now after a 11 year Solar Storm that ended in 2007. We are going into a mini ice age , not into global warming ! However, through greedy men's idea's that make no sense....they didn't believe that our Sun and solar system would take care of itself for another million years and still remain orbiting ! Now they have nearly destroyed our OZone layer, our sea levels have declined, almost all of the World is in a Drought, the bees , mosquitoes, grass , trees , soil is loaded with the Chemtrails fall out......and have all died.....animals are becoming extinct by the months, people are dying of asthma attacks...plants won't grow , soon the entire world will be in a famine....agriculture has been lost across the USA ,. I live in a heavily sprayed area where there is a $2 Billion Cherry industry...every time they spray us the temperatures drop 20 degrees..we did have a early spring last two years, with blue skies and sunshine....however, the men wanted to modify the weather and so they did and created 5 frosts after the cherry trees had blossomed...The farmers I interviewed told me they knew about the Chemtrails they have seen them over head for years....and then said...they had only gotten 3 cherries those past 3 years....they are bankrupted....they paid into farm crop insurance only to find out doesn't cover Cherry or Apple Trees...! The banksters approached them, telling them to take out loans to live on! Then I read an article where farmers crops are being purportedly manipulated by Wall Street where Chemtrails are encouraged so as to increase the commodity stocks for their investors.......while the poor farmer can't even get help plus destroying our food industry in the USA all for Wall Street crooks.......Makes not an oz of sense...Next Monsanto Czar will come along and offer then to buy GMO'd toxic seeds to grow in Aluminum in the soil that the government sprayed on us! makes no sense! Cherry trees which will take another 10 years to mature and by that time, our earth will be so loaded with Aluminum and Barium dust that our entire earth will be lifeless and will glow in the dark and be so heated up like Venus which is 800 degrees! This winter not even the soil froze as much as it usually does cuz of all of the Aluminum in it , it stayed warm under the snow.....! . what in the world are they spraying? ita pt. 1/4 (Canadia researcher, David Keith Geo-Engineer, discuss's why he chose Aluminium at the Geo Engineering conference )Michael Murphy Tmp. asks him a question concerning the toxicity of Aluminium particulates, see how the man has not even studied the effects on humans and plants...."only begun to research and published nothing"! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... Chemtrails Special http://www.coasttocoastam.com/... Date: 03-30-13 Host: John B. Wells Guests: William Thomas, Michael Murphy In the first half of the program, investigative journalist William Thomas joined John B. Wells to reveal a correlation between chemtrails, electromagnetic radiation and human health. For some time now the military has been spreading barium in the sky in order to bounce military radio and radar beams, as well as HAARP, over the horizon, Thomas explained. This 'aerosol project' has been confirmed by two scientists at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, he noted. Evidence of barium fallout can be found on rainy days in the soapy runoff seen along roadways, Thomas added. These chemtrails not only interfere with weather patterns but also amplify the harmful effects of radio frequency and microwave exposure, he said. "Chemtrails give us a toxic exposure and barium-boosted wireless radiation inhibits our body's ability to compensate and respond," Thomas continued. Dosage is cumulative over time and can cause numerous symptoms, including aching joints, asthma attacks, headaches, sudden dizziness, rashes and sores, gastrointestinal discomfort, persistent cough, inability to concentrate, and problems with the heart, he reported. The dangerous synergism of barium mixed with our everyday exposure to electromagnetic radiation is not the only hazard—the particle size is also toxic, according to Thomas. Inhaling particles of barium aerosol will inflame the heart and can potentially cause a heart attack within 24 hours, he disclosed. During the latter half of the show, filmmaker Michael Murphy spoke about chemtrails and geoengineering, which he identified as "the greatest threat to our planet that we will ever have." According to Murphy, toxic aluminum oxide is being sprayed into the atmosphere to modify the Earth's climate. The stated goal of the geoengineers is to mitigate the effects of global warming, he said, noting that saving the planet has nothing to do with their real agenda. Geoengineering actually causes ozone depletion, changes to the pH of soil, as well as droughts and floods, Murphy explained, adding that as many as two billion people could have food disruptions because of it. So why are they spraying? Murphy thinks weather control is the most effective way for the elite to consolidate monetary and political power. He announced that he is working with other organizations to get these programs stopped. Website(s): willthomasonline.net whyintheworldaretheyspraying.c... Video(s): What in the World Are They Spraying? Why in the World Are They Spraying? Book(s): Chemtrails Confirmed Meteorologist Decodes Chemtrails, HAARP and Weather Manipulation
Irrefutable Truth. U.S. Military intentionally poisoning us! MORGELLONS EX
73 chemtrails in 2minutes! (ENGLAND)(HAARP weather control)
http://archive.org/details/rbe... ROSALIE BERTELL: MAKE VISIBLE WHATS HAPPENING Part 1: CHEMTRAILS Most people have noticed chemtrails, because its not natural to have something criss-crossing in your sky. Dr. Bertell (Ph.D., biometrics) offers several explanations, including her own: I think theyre also a carrier for all kinds of biological and chemical warfare. I dont think theyre dropping them on us right now, but they seem to be preparing. I think theyre getting people used to seeing these things, and theyre getting the military used to doing it. So theyre practicing Sr. Bertell also touches on what some government workers (e.g., Oak Ridge nuclear plant) are told about chemtrails: a) theyre combating global warming via spraying populated areas with aerosolized metals; b) aerial pharmacopeia (pollution modification). The official story, though, is denial. Part 1 of a series (6:34) See text for complete interview (link). Part 2: THE OFFICIAL 9-11 STORY IS NOT CREDIBLE Its very important that we take a look at the starting point of this war on terror. Something else happened to bring those buildings down and Building 7 came down without being hit [in 6.5 seconds]The Pentagon is even more problematictheres no plane; theyve never found parts of the plane. The official story is not credible. Its not credible. Rosalie Bertell Part 2 (5:47) Part 3: WE CAN DO ENOUGH DAMAGE TO OUR WORLD THAT IT DOESNT SURVIVE . Dr. Bertell holds advanced degrees in math, physics, chemistry, biology and biochemistry. She also has five honorary Doctorate degrees. She led the International Medical Commission (IMC) investigations into Chernobyl and Union Carbides Bhopal disaster. An environmental epidemiologist for nearly 40 years, shes also a member of the Grey Nuns of the Sacred Heart. She is whats known as a credible source, someone who should be listened to carefully. Dr. Bertell explores here possible explanations for recent earthquake anomalies: a gamma ray/gravity wave from space? Or HAARP-induce deep earth tomography or direct wave weapon, accident or purposeful? Sr. Rosalie concludes: We can do enough damage to our world that it doesnt survive. But it doesnt seem to enter their heads that the Earth is alive. Its aliveYou know, we affect its basic operation, its survival. Part 3 (14:35) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... Weather Wars, HAARP and Chemtrails - Pt 1 of 4 ( describes the atmospheres ) Weather Wars, HAARP and Chemtrails - Pt 2 of 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... ( Military Industrial Complex shot Atomic bombs into the Atmospheres creating holes into the 'belts" ruining the OZONE) Vision for 2020 http://www.fas.org/spp/militar... Weather Wars, HAARP and Chemtrails - Pt 3 of 4 ( dumping Lithium and Barium into the Atmosphere! 2 tons dumped and then they wonder why the crops are destroyed! Star Wars program, Space Shield) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... Weather Wars, HAARP and Chemtrails - Pt 4 of 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... ( the Military is doing this not for the good of the people but for the purpose of killing) http://globalskywatch.com/stor...


Meteorologist Decodes Chemtrails, HAARP and Weather Manipulation
Chemtrails NEW Information with Michael Murphy




    LINKS FOR THE VIDEOS IN JANICE'S (HICKS) ARTICLE (OR RATHER ,'COMMENT' ON GEOENGINEERING ARTICLE ON CFR MAGAZINE)

    Meteorologist Decodes Chemtrails, HAARP and Weather Manipulation
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmKm36QlG6Q


    Irrefutable Truth. U.S. Military intentionally poisoning us! MORGELLONS EX
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q08qTXVS3eA

    73 chemtrails in 2minutes! (ENGLAND)(HAARP weather control)
    73 chemtrails in 2minutes! (ENGLAND)(HAARP weather control)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrdc6fXvnHw


    Why in the World Are They Spraying?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEfJO0-cTis
    Chemtrails New Information Michael Murphy

    Chemtrails New Information Michael Murphy

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGrPiK2pROg
    Clifford Carnicom. Chemtrails, Aerosols & Morgellons FULL

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWCx-crLANY
    JANICE'S (HICKS) ARTICLE
    WE the people of the world have noticed these Chemtrails in our skies and the planes flyin g over head for years. I personally have been complaining to our local, state and Federal Government for years too. Our government has denied it and called us "Conspiracy Theorists"! I was happy to see them finally admit it...they need to apologize to us and they need to pay off all of the people's health bills that they created from spraying Aluminium , Barium and Strontium experimenting on this planet earth and destroying lives, plants & trees that need CO-2 to grow and to make photosyntheisis from the Sunlight that they then give off Oxygen so we humans can breathe!!!!! $10 billion dollars wasted and possibly nearly destroyed our OZONE , Shredded our Atmosphere then allowing in more EMG;s from the Sun! How stupid of them ! Rosalie Bertrell Ph.D of the EPA has numerous video's describing the thin layers of our Atmosphere and how they have sprayed tons of aluminum dust into our 3 Atmospheres including the Plasma and that will take billions of years for that to be there and do nothing for human and plant life beneficial.....CO-2 is not our problem , this planet needs CO-2 to live!
    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com...
    To counteract anthropogenic climate change, several schemes have been proposed to diminish solar radiation incident on Earth's surface. These geoengineering schemes could reverse global annual mean warming; however, it is unclear to what extent they would mitigate regional and seasonal climate change, because radiative forcing from greenhouse gases such as CO2 differs from that of sunlight. No previous study has directly addressed this issue. In the NCAR CCM3 atmospheric general circulation model, we reduced the solar luminosity to balance the increased radiative forcing from doubling atmospheric CO2. Our results indicate that geoengineering schemes could markedly diminish regional and seasonal climate change from increased atmospheric CO2, despite differences in radiative forcing patterns. Nevertheless, geoengineering schemes could prove environmentally risky.
    The Sun is very calm right now after a 11 year Solar Storm that ended in 2007. We are going into a mini ice age , not into global warming ! However, through greedy men's idea's that make no sense....they didn't believe that our Sun and solar system would take care of itself for another million years and still remain orbiting ! Now they have nearly destroyed our OZone layer, our sea levels have declined, almost all of the World is in a Drought, the bees , mosquitoes, grass , trees , soil is loaded with the Chemtrails fall out......and have all died.....animals are becoming extinct by the months, people are dying of asthma attacks...plants won't grow , soon the entire world will be in a famine....agriculture has been lost across the USA ,. I live in a heavily sprayed area where there is a $2 Billion Cherry industry...every time they spray us the temperatures drop 20 degrees..we did have a early spring last two years, with blue skies and sunshine....however, the men wanted to modify the weather and so they did and created 5 frosts after the cherry trees had blossomed...The farmers I interviewed told me they knew about the Chemtrails they have seen them over head for years....and then said...they had only gotten 3 cherries those past 3 years....they are bankrupted....they paid into farm crop insurance only to find out doesn't cover Cherry or Apple Trees...! The banksters approached them, telling them to take out loans to live on! Then I read an article where farmers crops are being purportedly manipulated by Wall Street where Chemtrails are encouraged so as to increase the commodity stocks for their investors.......while the poor farmer can't even get help plus destroying our food industry in the USA all for Wall Street crooks.......Makes not an oz of sense...Next Monsanto Czar will come along and offer then to buy GMO'd toxic seeds to grow in Aluminum in the soil that the government sprayed on us! makes no sense! Cherry trees which will take another 10 years to mature and by that time, our earth will be so loaded with Aluminum and Barium dust that our entire earth will be lifeless and will glow in the dark and be so heated up like Venus which is 800 degrees! This winter not even the soil froze as much as it usually does cuz of all of the Aluminum in it , it stayed warm under the snow.....!
    .
    what in the world are they spraying? ita pt. 1/4 (Canadia researcher, David Keith Geo-Engineer, discuss's why he chose Aluminium at the Geo Engineering conference )Michael Murphy Tmp. asks him a question concerning the toxicity of Aluminium particulates, see how the man has not even studied the effects on humans and plants...."only begun to research and published nothing"!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
     Chemtrails Special
    http://www.coasttocoastam.com/...
    Date: 03-30-13
    Host: John B. Wells
    Guests: William Thomas, Michael Murphy
    In the first half of the program, investigative journalist William Thomas joined John B. Wells to reveal a correlation between chemtrails, electromagnetic radiation and human health. For some time now the military has been spreading barium in the sky in order to bounce military radio and radar beams, as well as HAARP, over the horizon, Thomas explained. This 'aerosol project' has been confirmed by two scientists at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, he noted. Evidence of barium fallout can be found on rainy days in the soapy runoff seen along roadways, Thomas added. These chemtrails not only interfere with weather patterns but also amplify the harmful effects of radio frequency and microwave exposure, he said.
    "Chemtrails give us a toxic exposure and barium-boosted wireless radiation inhibits our body's ability to compensate and respond," Thomas continued. Dosage is cumulative over time and can cause numerous symptoms, including aching joints, asthma attacks, headaches, sudden dizziness, rashes and sores, gastrointestinal discomfort, persistent cough, inability to concentrate, and problems with the heart, he reported. The dangerous synergism of barium mixed with our everyday exposure to electromagnetic radiation is not the only hazard—the particle size is also toxic, according to Thomas. Inhaling particles of barium aerosol will inflame the heart and can potentially cause a heart attack within 24 hours, he disclosed.
    During the latter half of the show, filmmaker Michael Murphy spoke about chemtrails and geoengineering, which he identified as "the greatest threat to our planet that we will ever have." According to Murphy, toxic aluminum oxide is being sprayed into the atmosphere to modify the Earth's climate. The stated goal of the geoengineers is to mitigate the effects of global warming, he said, noting that saving the planet has nothing to do with their real agenda. Geoengineering actually causes ozone depletion, changes to the pH of soil, as well as droughts and floods, Murphy explained, adding that as many as two billion people could have food disruptions because of it. So why are they spraying? Murphy thinks weather control is the most effective way for the elite to consolidate monetary and political power. He announced that he is working with other organizations to get these programs stopped.
    Website(s):
    willthomasonline.net
    whyintheworldaretheyspraying.c...
    Video(s):
    What in the World Are They Spraying?
    Why in the World Are They Spraying?
    Book(s):
    Chemtrails Confirmed
    Meteorologist Decodes Chemtrails, HAARP and Weather Manipulation
      

    Irrefutable Truth. U.S. Military intentionally poisoning us! MORGELLONS EX
      


    73 chemtrails in 2minutes! (ENGLAND)(HAARP weather control)
      


    http://archive.org/details/rbe...
    ROSALIE BERTELL: MAKE VISIBLE WHATS HAPPENING
    Part 1: CHEMTRAILS Most people have noticed chemtrails, because its not natural to have something criss-crossing in your sky. Dr. Bertell (Ph.D., biometrics) offers several explanations, including her own: I think theyre also a carrier for all kinds of biological and chemical warfare. I dont think theyre dropping them on us right now, but they seem to be preparing. I think theyre getting people used to seeing these things, and theyre getting the military used to doing it. So theyre practicing Sr. Bertell also touches on what some government workers (e.g., Oak Ridge nuclear plant) are told about chemtrails: a) theyre combating global warming via spraying populated areas with aerosolized metals; b) aerial pharmacopeia (pollution modification). The official story, though, is denial. Part 1 of a series (6:34) See text for complete interview (link).
    Part 2: THE OFFICIAL 9-11 STORY IS NOT CREDIBLE Its very important that we take a look at the starting point of this war on terror. Something else happened to bring those buildings down and Building 7 came down without being hit [in 6.5 seconds]The Pentagon is even more problematictheres no plane; theyve never found parts of the plane. The official story is not credible. Its not credible. Rosalie Bertell Part 2 (5:47)
    Part 3: WE CAN DO ENOUGH DAMAGE TO OUR WORLD THAT IT DOESNT SURVIVE . Dr. Bertell holds advanced degrees in math, physics, chemistry, biology and biochemistry. She also has five honorary Doctorate degrees. She led the International Medical Commission (IMC) investigations into Chernobyl and Union Carbides Bhopal disaster. An environmental epidemiologist for nearly 40 years, shes also a member of the Grey Nuns of the Sacred Heart. She is whats known as a credible source, someone who should be listened to carefully. Dr. Bertell explores here possible explanations for recent earthquake anomalies: a gamma ray/gravity wave from space? Or HAARP-induce deep earth tomography or direct wave weapon, accident or purposeful? Sr. Rosalie concludes: We can do enough damage to our world that it doesnt survive. But it doesnt seem to enter their heads that the Earth is alive. Its aliveYou know, we affect its basic operation, its survival. Part 3 (14:35)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
    Weather Wars, HAARP and Chemtrails - Pt 1 of 4
    ( describes the atmospheres )
    Weather Wars, HAARP and Chemtrails - Pt 2 of 4
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
    ( Military Industrial Complex shot Atomic bombs into the Atmospheres
    creating holes into the 'belts" ruining the OZONE)
    Vision for 2020
    http://www.fas.org/spp/militar...
    Weather Wars, HAARP and Chemtrails - Pt 3 of 4 ( dumping Lithium and Barium into the Atmosphere! 2 tons dumped and then they wonder why the crops are destroyed!
    Star Wars program, Space Shield)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
    Weather Wars, HAARP and Chemtrails - Pt 4 of 4
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
    ( the Military is doing this not for the good of the people but for the purpose of killing)
    http://globalskywatch.com/stor...

      =============================================

    Naytchureboy9 > Janice Hicks  • 8 months ago 
    Thank you very much Janice. We need a class-action law suit on behalf of all life on planet earth, and a criminal indictment against whose authority was allowed this abomination of irresponsibility to go forward with absolutely no environmental impact on exposure to all life and to the living systems we depend on for life itself.
    These people are nothing less than maniacs.
    3 people I know on the forefront in CA leading the charge are:
    1. Rosalind Petersen a farmer and former USDA and CADA crop-loss adjuster has many you tube taped presentations on the web and her website California SkyWatch Agriculture Defense Coalition at:
    http://www.agriculturedefensec...
    2. Dane Wigington another social activist whose personal money from his solar business has been used for the last 10 years now to conduct sample testing, and data collection, making presentations and compiling expert witness testimony from every sector in society from the federal and state bureaucracy that gives us a great portal for science discovery of the truth as well at: Geoengineering Watch
    http://www.geoengineeringwatch...
    3. Russel Blaylock, MD a world renowned neuro-surgeon who speaks out on the need to put a stop to this program for the nano-aluminum level of contamination to the human environment he says will be catastrophic to the toxicological and epidemiological impact on human health for its devastating effects on Alzheimers, ADD, Parkinsons, Lou Gehrigs, Autism, especially the major jump now in diagnostic cases now being reported by the CDC-like gee duh ya think?
    Because these nano-particulates are both absorbed and breathed in directly through the olfactory pathway directory into the brain where they collect over time and as the amount increases necessarily, since our neurotransmitter synapses operate on electro chemical circuitry are disrupted causing havoc to our memory, learning and brain development in children.
    I don't even believe anyone with a sound mind would of ever allowed this to go forward to introduce any kind of chemical compound into the environment without an environmental impact, for that is my field to begin with.
    I am a former Fire Captain now retired who worked as a HAZMAT coordinator, then went back to school and received my M.S. Environmental Engineering at UCI, then Univ. Arkansas with M.S. Ed where I am now taking time off to work on publishing several books, when I came back from Patagonia, South America here in Reno and saw them pounding the skies.
    So I have contacted my US Rep Amodei, took rain and snow samples and their now off to the lab.
    I wrote him an official letter asking him to assure both myself and family, and the community of his district here in Reno, NV that there will be no adverse health impact to us from the aerosol spraying being done overhead.
    Otherwise if it becomes necessary for myself and family to move after making such an investment to come here that requires I have to move to a safer place from exposure expect to be compensated for both my economic losses and that of what it will do to any future health-impacts from being exposed to chemical compounds that have been introduced into our environment that are not naturally occurring, but came by way of specific authorization from the federal government, which he had the ability to introduce a bill to try and assure the safety and health of his constituents .
    If everyone across America got smart they'd write a similar letter to hold them accountable, for they did nothing.
    Like, whatever happened to the "Clean Air Act" Clean Drinking Water Act?
    Notwithstanding NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) which stipulates that anything we do at the federal and state levels, that might impact the human health and balance of health in our ecosystems-environment, their must be a meticulous planning and discovery mode to determine what the impact is gonna be, which gave rise actually to the species protection acts and much of the litigation that came along with that, and the landmark 'Environmental Impoact Report" on making an assessment of the risk to health and our environment before undertaking any activity we spend money on to initiate any resource program, affecting the health and well-being of our planetary environment.
    That took a back seat, which questions even their legality to even get it off the ground.
    They did this with no Congressional hearings and oversight to human health assessment.
    Thats criminal in my book, and these people in Congress and the Executive must be held politically and civilly and criminally held liable for their reckless disregard for planet earth and all life which exists on it.
    Its that simple.
    This is not rocket science.
    Maintaining the balance and health of our ecological living systems are to be considered sacrosanct in terms of considering risk, before we proceed with anything which might impact it.
    And yet even when David Keith was asked by Dane W. in a presentation at a Geo-engineering climate conference symposium in San Diego some years back, when asked about what the impact to human health would be, by human and living-system exposure to all these aerosols in the skies responded by saying, 'We have not embarked yet on looking at that"!
    Which from the view point of someone with 25 years in Fire Protection/ Paramedical and HAZMAT services, who has responded to when the proverbial crap hits the fan as a daily occurrence, knows full well, there is a systemic problem of warped values which exist in the mindset culture of neoliberal capitalism, after we have done whats called, a "post hazard risk analysis of how this disaster could of been prevented.
    And what so many of my colleagues and I have found over repeated findings of the same result, indicates a mindset that puts profits above life first.
    And it doesn't matter what kind of commercial activity you are trying to do in order to accumulate money.
    We have a corrupted value system which places the worship of money and material form above that of life, health and well-being.
    And it exists in every sub-strata of socio-economic categories of measurement you look at as I have.
    which says we commodity everything we can think of into a profit, which transforms the state of consciousness into how we mediate everything we do in life at every level of relationship, instead by values which honor life first, and then look at solutions that follow from that.
    Weather you mfg, chemicals or products. Everything is number crunched by a risk factor of how much human life is valued. If it costs more to implement something which saves a life is more expensive than paying off a civil tort claim, they will pay the claim.
    Same with geoengineering.
    You'd think being at Harvard and Carnegie-Mellon they'd have some smarts.
    There actually dumb as rocks.
    They're not even engineers by the same standards my engineering background would ever tolerate.
    David Keith the point-man on GE would be failed by my standards of scholastic professionalism alone which I teach..
    The man needs to be run out of town on a rail.
    They were derelict in their duty to abide by their oath of office, and thus any adverse health impacts to the human environment by a federally taxpayer supported program they can cut their money supply off from was by their dereliction, become complicit by their tacit procuration in being held as accessories and criminally and civilly liable for punitive and compensatory costs.
    There is a lot of peer-reviewed studies on nano-aluminum, and mental health diseases affected by these particulates.
    4.Russell Blaylock, MD Chem-trails, Nano-aluminum and Neuro-degenerative and Neurodevelopmental Effects, April 17, 2012
    http://www.thenhf.com/article....
    He cites a mountain of peer-reviewed scientific studies from WEBMD, Pub Med, and peer-reviewed journals on the epidemiology and toxicology results that demonstrate the devastating effects these aerosols will cause, and why there needs to be a massive legal assault in the federal courts and UN to stop these programs NOW!
    Something Dr. Russel Blaylock has called for nation-wide.
    Happy Trails Janice

    Avatar

    Thank you very much Janice. We need a class-action law suit on behalf of all life on planet earth, and a criminal indictment against whose authority was allowed this abomination of irresponsibility to go forward with absolutely no environmental impact on exposure to all life and to the living systems we depend on for life itself. These people are nothing less than maniacs. 3 people I know on the forefront in CA leading the charge are: 1. Rosalind Petersen a farmer and former USDA and CADA crop-loss adjuster has many you tube taped presentations on the web and her website California SkyWatch Agriculture Defense Coalition at: http://www.agriculturedefensec... 2. Dane Wigington another social activist whose personal money from his solar business has been used for the last 10 years now to conduct sample testing, and data collection, making presentations and compiling expert witness testimony from every sector in society from the federal and state bureaucracy that gives us a great portal for science discovery of the truth as well at: Geoengineering Watch http://www.geoengineeringwatch... 3. Russel Blaylock, MD a world renowned neuro-surgeon who speaks out on the need to put a stop to this program for the nano-aluminum level of contamination to the human environment he says will be catastrophic to the toxicological and epidemiological impact on human health for its devastating effects on Alzheimers, ADD, Parkinsons, Lou Gehrigs, Autism, especially the major jump now in diagnostic cases now being reported by the CDC-like gee duh ya think? Because these nano-particulates are both absorbed and breathed in directly through the olfactory pathway directory into the brain where they collect over time and as the amount increases necessarily, since our neurotransmitter synapses operate on electro chemical circuitry are disrupted causing havoc to our memory, learning and brain development in children. I don't even believe anyone with a sound mind would of ever allowed this to go forward to introduce any kind of chemical compound into the environment without an environmental impact, for that is my field to begin with. I am a former Fire Captain now retired who worked as a HAZMAT coordinator, then went back to school and received my M.S. Environmental Engineering at UCI, then Univ. Arkansas with M.S. Ed where I am now taking time off to work on publishing several books, when I came back from Patagonia, South America here in Reno and saw them pounding the skies. So I have contacted my US Rep Amodei, took rain and snow samples and their now off to the lab. I wrote him an official letter asking him to assure both myself and family, and the community of his district here in Reno, NV that there will be no adverse health impact to us from the aerosol spraying being done overhead. Otherwise if it becomes necessary for myself and family to move after making such an investment to come here that requires I have to move to a safer place from exposure expect to be compensated for both my economic losses and that of what it will do to any future health-impacts from being exposed to chemical compounds that have been introduced into our environment that are not naturally occurring, but came by way of specific authorization from the federal government, which he had the ability to introduce a bill to try and assure the safety and health of his constituents . If everyone across America got smart they'd write a similar letter to hold them accountable, for they did nothing. Like, whatever happened to the "Clean Air Act" Clean Drinking Water Act? Notwithstanding NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) which stipulates that anything we do at the federal and state levels, that might impact the human health and balance of health in our ecosystems-environment, their must be a meticulous planning and discovery mode to determine what the impact is gonna be, which gave rise actually to the species protection acts and much of the litigation that came along with that, and the landmark 'Environmental Impoact Report" on making an assessment of the risk to health and our environment before undertaking any activity we spend money on to initiate any resource program, affecting the health and well-being of our planetary environment. That took a back seat, which questions even their legality to even get it off the ground. They did this with no Congressional hearings and oversight to human health assessment. Thats criminal in my book, and these people in Congress and the Executive must be held politically and civilly and criminally held liable for their reckless disregard for planet earth and all life which exists on it. Its that simple. This is not rocket science. Maintaining the balance and health of our ecological living systems are to be considered sacrosanct in terms of considering risk, before we proceed with anything which might impact it. And yet even when David Keith was asked by Dane W. in a presentation at a Geo-engineering climate conference symposium in San Diego some years back, when asked about what the impact to human health would be, by human and living-system exposure to all these aerosols in the skies responded by saying, 'We have not embarked yet on looking at that"! Which from the view point of someone with 25 years in Fire Protection/ Paramedical and HAZMAT services, who has responded to when the proverbial crap hits the fan as a daily occurrence, knows full well, there is a systemic problem of warped values which exist in the mindset culture of neoliberal capitalism, after we have done whats called, a "post hazard risk analysis of how this disaster could of been prevented. And what so many of my colleagues and I have found over repeated findings of the same result, indicates a mindset that puts profits above life first. And it doesn't matter what kind of commercial activity you are trying to do in order to accumulate money. We have a corrupted value system which places the worship of money and material form above that of life, health and well-being. And it exists in every sub-strata of socio-economic categories of measurement you look at as I have. which says we commodity everything we can think of into a profit, which transforms the state of consciousness into how we mediate everything we do in life at every level of relationship, instead by values which honor life first, and then look at solutions that follow from that. Weather you mfg, chemicals or products. Everything is number crunched by a risk factor of how much human life is valued. If it costs more to implement something which saves a life is more expensive than paying off a civil tort claim, they will pay the claim. Same with geoengineering. You'd think being at Harvard and Carnegie-Mellon they'd have some smarts. There actually dumb as rocks. They're not even engineers by the same standards my engineering background would ever tolerate. David Keith the point-man on GE would be failed by my standards of scholastic professionalism alone which I teach.. The man needs to be run out of town on a rail. They were derelict in their duty to abide by their oath of office, and thus any adverse health impacts to the human environment by a federally taxpayer supported program they can cut their money supply off from was by their dereliction, become complicit by their tacit procuration in being held as accessories and criminally and civilly liable for punitive and compensatory costs. There is a lot of peer-reviewed studies on nano-aluminum, and mental health diseases affected by these particulates. 4.Russell Blaylock, MD Chem-trails, Nano-aluminum and Neuro-degenerative and Neurodevelopmental Effects, April 17, 2012 http://www.thenhf.com/article.... He cites a mountain of peer-reviewed scientific studies from WEBMD, Pub Med, and peer-reviewed journals on the epidemiology and toxicology results that demonstrate the devastating effects these aerosols will cause, and why there needs to be a massive legal assault in the federal courts and UN to stop these programs NOW! Something Dr. Russel Blaylock has called for nation-wide. Happy Trails Janice



















Global Commons




Snapshot,
Milosz Reterski

In defending its vital interests in the Arctic, the United States lacks a critical tool: mighty nuclear-powered icebreakers that would solidify its economic and strategic role in the region. Russia is surging ahead in this area, and the United States must catch up.  
Essay, Nov/Dec 2014
Richard N. Haass

With U.S. hegemony waning and no successor waiting to pick up the baton, the current international system will likely give way to a larger number of power centers acting with increasing autonomy. The post–Cold War order is unraveling, and it will be missed.
Snapshot,
Joseph Chinyong Liow

The economic potential of the Arctic is undoubtedly considerable, and that has heightened Asian interest in the region. Because these are perilous times for the Arctic environment, though, the exploration (and exploitation) of the area needs to be done sustainably.
Essay, JUL/AUG 2014
Erik Brynjolfsson, Andrew McAfee, and Michael Spence

Machines are substituting for more types of human labor than ever before. This means that the real winners of the future will be neither the providers of cheap labor nor the owners of ordinary capital, but rather those who can innovate and create new products, services, and business models.
Essay, JUL/AUG 2014
Benn Steil

In today’s dollar-dominated financial system, changes in U.S. monetary policy can have immediate and significant global effects, wrecking economies and toppling regimes. As a result, for many countries monetary sovereignty is nothing but a dream.
Video,
Stuart Reid and Ólafur Ragnar Grímsson

Stuart Reid, senior editor at Foreign Affairs, sits down with Ã“lafur Ragnar Grímsson, president of Iceland.
Snapshot,
Alan B. Sielen

There is no shortage of international recommendations, action plans, and other prescriptions for restoring the oceans’ health. The problem is not ignorance but political will. Yet the longer governments and societies delay action, the worse things will get. Here are some things they can start doing now.
Snapshot,
Stacie L. Pettyjohn

Last month, Washington pledged to give up control of ICANN, a nonprofit that manages the Internet's domain name system. Critics say the move will empower repressive regimes to restrict Internet freedom. But it actually provides the best chance of preserving an open system.
Snapshot,
David A. Welch

We have come to appreciate that our rapidly increasing technological sophistication -- which has brought such benefits as safe and convenient air travel -- carries with it potential costs. It gives us greater ability to destroy, of course. But, it can also lead to the creation of vulnerable, tightly-connected, and inadequately resilient systems. And in those systems, individuals and organizations are often the weakest links -- as the recent Malaysia Airlines disaster makes clear.
Snapshot,
Bilal Y. Saab

As the United States redefines its role in the Middle East, regional powers will feel pressure to exercise restraint and cooperate with each other. And that is exactly what the UAE is doing by potentially striking a deal with Iran over the disputed islands of Abu Musa and Greater and Lesser Tunbs.



No comments:

Post a Comment