FAIR USE NOTICE

FAIR USE NOTICE: The information and materials used on this blog, i.e. articles, videos,etc., may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, spiritual, religious, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: /http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode

Thursday, September 30, 2021

The Zelenko Protocol for early Covid Treatment and for Prophylaxis

 

 FROM DR ZELENKO TO PTESIDENT TRUMP in a letter dated April 7th, 2020

My field-tested treatment regimen for high risk patients with clinical diagnosis is as follows:

Hydroxychloroquine 200mg twice a day for 5 days

Azithromycin 500mg once a day for 5 days

Zinc sulfate 220mg (or the equivalent of 50mg elemental zinc) once a day for 5 days

I also suggest the following prophylactic regimen for very high risk individuals:

Hydroxychloroquine 200mg once a day for 5 days, and then 1 pill a week until immunity can be shown or a vaccine becomes available.

Zinc Sulfate 220mg (or the equivalent of 50mg elemental zinc) once a day for 5 days, and then 1 pill a week until immunity can be shown or a vaccine becomes available.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://faculty.utrgv.edu/eleftherios.gkioulekas/zelenko/Zelenko-memo-August-prophylaxis.pdf

 

Zelenko Covid-19 Prophylaxis Protocol 

Website: Vladimirzelenkomd.com 

Prophylaxis is an action taken to prevent or protect against a specified disease. Greek in origin, from the word "phylax", meaning "to guard" and "watching." 

Low Risk Patients 

Young healthy people do not need prophylaxis against Covid 19. In young and healthy people, this infection causes mild cold-like symptoms. It is advantageous for these patients to be exposed to Covid-19, build up their antibodies and have their immune system clear the virus. This will facilitate the development of herd immunity and help prevent future Covid-19 pandemics. However, if these patients desire prophylaxis against Covid-19, then they should take the protocol noted below. 

Moderate Risk Patients 

Patients from this category are healthy but have high potential viral-load exposure. This group includes medical personnel, caregivers of high-risk patients, people who use public transportation, first responders and other essential personnel who are crucial to the continued functioning of society. These patients should be encouraged to take prophylaxis against Covid-19 in accordance with the protocol noted below. 

High Risk Patients 

Patients are considered high risk if they are over the age of 45, or if they are younger than 45 but they have comorbidities, that is, they have other health conditions that put them at risk. These patients have between a 5 to 10% mortality rate if they are infected with Covid-19. These patients should be strongly encouraged to take prophylaxis against Covid-19 in accordance with the protocol noted below.

 

Protocol for Low and Moderate Risk Patients: 

Elemental Zinc 25mg 1 time a day 1 

Vitamin D3 5000iu 1 time a day 

Vitamin C 1000mg 1 time a day 2 

Quercetin 500mg 1 time a day until a safe and efficacious vaccine becomes available 

If Quercetin is unavailable, then use Epigallocatechin-gallate (EGCG) 400mg 1 time a day 3


Protocol for High Risk Patients: 

Elemental Zinc 25mg once a day 

Vitamin D3 5000iu 1 time a day 

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ4 ) 200mg 1 time a day for 5 days, then 1 time a week until a safe and efficacious vaccine becomes available 

If HCQ is unavailable, then use the Protocol for Low and Moderate Risk Patients. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7365891/

2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318306/ 

3 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jf5014633 

4 https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202007.0025/v1

Tuesday, September 28, 2021

Legal Document For Employers Requiring the Vaccine to Sign : America's Frontline Doctors

 

There are different legal documents  to give to those who require the vaccine (schools, military, firefighters, etc.) at America's Frontline Doctors website. They also have a legal team now. https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/legal/vaccines-the-law/


This is the legal form for employers found at the following web address:

https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/609462860f3394d5991a85fd_Employee-Form-Covid-Injections.pdf 

NOTE TO EMPLOYER: As your employee, I am requesng that you review this document, provide the requisite informaon, and sign the form, in regards to your requirement that employees get a Covid19 emergency use authorizaon (EUA) investigational vaccine. 

1) If I agree to receive an EUA Covid-19 injecon, does my employee health insurance plan provide complete coverage should I experience an adverse event, or even death? ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2) As an employee, does my life insurance policy provide any coverage in the event that I die from receiving an EUA Covid-19 injecon? ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

3) As an employee, will you be providing Workers’ Compensaon, disability insurance, or other resources if I have an adverse event to an EUA Covid-19 injecon and am unable to come to work for days, weeks, or months, or if I am disabled for life? _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________4) The Food and Drug Administraon (FDA) requires that EUA vaccine recipients be provided with certain vaccine-speci+c informaon to help them make an informed decision about vaccinaon. 8 The EUA fact sheets that must be provided are speci,c to each authorized Covid-19 injecon and are developed by the manufacturers of the injecons (P,zer/BioNTech, Moderna, Oxford/AstraZeneca, and the Johnson & Johnson subsidiary Janssen). The fact sheets must provide the most current and up-to-date informaon on the injecons, and vaccine recipients must also receive informaon about adverse events. Have you read, understood, and provided me (and all other employees) with these fact sheets and with current informaon on adverse events so that I/we can make an educated decision? ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ 

5) Have you reviewed the available databases of material adverse events reported to date for people who have received Covid-19 injecons?9,10,11,12 Potenal and reported adverse events include death, anaphylaxis, neurological disorders, autoimmune disorders, other long-term chronic diseases, blindness and deafness, inferlity, fetal damage, miscarriage, and sllbirth. ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ 

6) The FDA’s guidance13 on emergency use authorizaon of medical products requires the FDA to “ensure that recipients are informed to the extent praccable given the applicable circumstances… [t]hat they have the opon to accept or refuse the EUA product….” Are you aware of this statement? Have you informed all employees that they have the opon to refuse? ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ 

7) With respect to the emergency use of an unapproved product, the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmec Act, Title 21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(I-III)14 reiterates that individuals be informed of “the opon to accept or refuse administraon of the product, [and] of the consequences, if any, of refusing administraon of the product, and of the alternaves to the product that are available and of their bene,ts and risks.” If EUA Covid-19 invesgaonal vaccines are ever approved by the FDA, state legislaon would be required to allow companies to mandate the Covid-19 injecons. Are you aware of these facts? ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ 

8) EUA products are unapproved, unlicensed, and experimental. Under the Nuremberg Code—the foundaon of ethical medicine—no one may be coerced to parcipate in a medical experiment. The individual’s consent is absolutely essenal. No court has ever upheld a mandate for an EUA vaccine. In Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F. Supp. 2d 119 (2003)15 , a federal court held that the U.S. military could not mandate EUA vaccines for soldiers: “...[T]he United States cannot demand that members of the armed forces also serve as guinea pigs for experimental drugs” (Id. at 135). Are you aware of this? ___________________________________________________________________________________ 

9) The United States Code of Federal Regulaons16 and the FDA require the informed consent of human subjects for medical research. The EUA Covid-19 injecons are unapproved, unlicensed, invesgaonal vaccines that are sll in their experimental stage. It is unlawful to conduct medical research on a human being, even in the event of an emergency, unless steps are taken to secure the informed consent of all parcipants. Are you aware of this? _________________________________________________________________________________ 

10) According to Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Guidelines17 and the FTC’s “Truth In Adversing,”18 promoonal material—and especially material involving health-related products—cannot mislead consumers, omit important informaon, or express claims. All of this falls under the rubric of “decepve adversing” (whereby a company is providing or endorsing a product), whether presented in the form of an ad, on a website, through email, on a poster, or in the mail. For example, statements such as “all employees are required to get the Covid-19 vaccine to make the workspace safe” or “it’s safe and eIecve” leave out crical informaon. Crical informaon includes the facts that Covid-19 injecons are unapproved EUA vaccines that “may” or “may not” prevent Covid, won’t necessarily make the workspace safer, and could in fact cause harm. Not providing links or aJachments of the manufacturers’ fact sheets and current informaon on adverse events is omiKng safety informaon. Are you aware of this? _________________________________________________________________________________ 

11) Since the Covid lockdowns began over one year ago, there have been over 178 reported breaches of unsecured protected health informaon (PHI), incidents invesgated by the ONce for Civil Rights (OCR). These breaches exposed millions of people’s personal health informaon. Although many of these incidents were aJributed to hacking, some of the breaches to PHI fell directly under the 1996 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), such as sharing a paent’s or person’s informaon with an unauthorized individual or incorrectly handling PHI.19 Can you please explain your obligaons to me, under HIPAA law, and how you are going to protect my personal informaon - both with respect to your requirement that I receive this injecon? ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ 

12) Whereas pharmaceucal companies that manufacture EUA vaccines have been protected from liability related to injuries or deaths caused by experimental agents since the PREP Act1 was enacted in 2005, companies and all other instuons or individuals who mandate experimental vaccines on any human being are not protected from liability. Are you aware that you do not enjoy such liability protecon? ________________________________________________________________________________ 

13) Are you aware that employees could ,le a civil suit against you should they suIer an adverse event, death, or terminaon from their place of employment? ________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________As the legally authorized oNcer of the employer/company, I have read all of the above informaon, have provided my employees with all of the informaon that the FDA requires be provided to recipients of the Covid-19 injecons, and do hereby agree to assume 100% ,nancial responsibility for covering any and all expenses from adverse events, including death, through insurance coverage or directly. In addion, I aNrm that the employee will not be subjected to the loss of their job should they decline to receive a Covid-19 injecon. _______________________________________________ 


Authorized oNcer of company requiring injecon

_____________________________________________________

Company ____________________________________________

Date_________________________________________________

 

Employee_____________________________________________ 

Company______________________________________________ 

Date __________________________________________________ 


Witness________________________________________________ 

Company______________________________________________ 

Date__________________________________________________ 


Endnotes: 

1. Congressional Research Service. The PREP Act and COVID-19: Liming Liability for Medical Countermeasures. Updated Mar. 19, 2021. hJps://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10443. 

2. Del Bigtree interviews 3 medical professionals incapacitated by Covid injecons. The Highwire, Apr. 29, 2021. hJps://www.bitchute.com/video/A4d8FB2cIBTc/. 

3. America’s Frontline Doctors. Vaccines & the law. hJps://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.org/legal/vaccines-the-law. 

4. Layton, Catharine. Forced to get the COVID vaccine? ICAN may be able to help. The Defender, Jan. 29, 2021. hJps://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/forced-to-get-covid-vaccine-ican-may-be-able-to-help/. 

5. hJps://uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/,les/Vaccine%20AJorneys.pdf. 

6. The Solari Report. Family Financial Disclosure Form for Covid-19 injecons. Mar. 1, 2021. hJps://pandemic.solari.com/family- ,nancial-disclosure-form-for-covid-19-injecons/. 

7. The Solari Report. Form for Students AJending Colleges or Universies Requiring Covid-19 Injecons. May 3, 2021. hJps://pandemic.solari.com/form-for-students-aJending-colleges-or-universies-requiring-covid-19-injecons/ 

8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevenon. COVID-19 Vaccine Emergency Use Authorizaon (EUA) Fact Sheets for Recipients and Caregivers. hJps://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/eua/index.html. 

9. UK Medical Freedom Alliance. COVID-19 Vaccine Info. hJps://www.ukmedfreedom.org/resources/covid-19-vaccine-info. 

10. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporng System. hJps://vaers.hhs.gov. 

11. CDC WONDER. About the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporng System (VAERS). hJps://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html. 

12. Naonal Vaccine Informaon Center. Search the U.S. Government’s VAERS Data. hJps://www.medalerts.org/. 

13. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Emergency Use Authorizaon of Medical Products and Related Authories: Guidance for Industry and Other Stakeholders. January 2017. hJps://www.fda.gov/media/97321/download. 

14. 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorizaon for medical products for use in emergencies. hJps://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3. 

15. Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F. Supp. 2d 119 (2003). hJps://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2326816/doe-v-rumsfeld/. 

16. hJps://www.govregs.com/regulaons/expand/tle21_chapterI_part50_subpartB_secon50.24#regulaon_2. 

17. Federal Trade Commission. Adversing FAQ’s: A Guide for Small Business. hJps://www.Yc.gov/ps-advice/business-center/guidance/adversing-faqs-guide-small-business. 

18. Federal Trade Commission. Truth in Adversing. hJps://www.Yc.gov/news-events/media-resources/truth-adversing. 

19. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ONce for Civil Rights. Breach Portal: Noce to the Secretary of HHS Breach of Unsecured Protected Health Informaon. hJps://ocrportal.hhs.gov/ocr/breach/breach_report.jsf;jsessionid=618E88DD94EE65D46D5785CB2A643553

Friday, September 24, 2021

September Government Report Shows $206 Million Paid so far in 2019 for Vaccine Injuries and Deaths

 

This article is from the editor of Health Impact News. It is from 2019. He includes the web addresses for the government documents with the information that he cites.

https://vaccineimpact.com/2019/september-government-report-shows-206-million-paid-so-far-in-2019-for-vaccine-injuries-and-deaths/


September Government Report Shows $206 Million Paid so far in 2019 for Vaccine Injuries and Deaths



by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The federal government Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV) under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services just concluded their third meeting of 2019 on September 6th.

These quarterly meetings include a report from the Department of Justice (DOJ) on cases settled for vaccine injuries and deaths as mandated by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP). The September 2019 report can be found here.

The NVICP was started as a result of a law passed in 1986 that gave pharmaceutical companies legal immunity from being sued due to injuries and deaths resulting from vaccines.

So far in 2019 the NVICP has paid out $206,295,187.00 in damages due to vaccine injuries and deaths. (Source.)

This is public information, but it is not covered in the corporate “mainstream” media. As far as we know, Health Impact News is the only media source that publishes these DOJ reports on vaccine injuries and deaths each quarter. Past reports can be found here.

In fact, by publishing these government reports, we are accused of publishing “fake news,” even though all the facts we are publishing here come from government-funded reports. (See: Self-Appointed Internet Police Declare MedicalKidnap.com and DOJ Vaccine Court Reports Fake News.)

The only narrative that corporate “mainstream” media outlets are allowed to publish regarding vaccines, is that they are “safe and effective,” and that the “science is settled.” Only medical professionals who agree to this narrative are allowed a voice in these media outlets.

Where the true facts regarding the danger and risks caused by vaccines are hard to hide are in the courts, such as these quarterly DOJ reports, which are mandated by law to be published.

So outrageous are the efforts of the corporate media giants to suppress this information, that in the rare instances where an attorney may be interviewed by them, the attorney’s credibility is attacked, usually by appealing to the authority of a doctor.

In other words, facts don’t matter.

To see this on display yourself, view this recent interview on CNN with NYC attorney Robert Krakow, discussing a lawsuit brought by parents who were denied religious exemptions to the MMR vaccine due to a supposed “measles outbreak.”

Robert Krakow is a vaccine injury attorney, who deals with vaccine injuries in the federal vaccine court. And yet, the CNN news host disclaims everything he has to say by personally attacking him for not being a medical doctor and therefore not qualified to speak about the safety of the MMR vaccine, and stating that their own TV doctor, Sanjay Gupta, has already assured everyone that the MMR vaccine is completely safe, and therefore Attorney Krakow must be wrong.

This is a rare moment in the corporate-sponsored “mainstream” media where it can be clearly seen that facts regarding vaccines don’t matter, only their own hand-selected “medical authorities” are qualified to discuss this topic.

Attorney Krakow: “We have medical experts too.”

The September 2019 DOJ report states that 307 petitions were filed during the 3-month time period between 5/16/19 – 8/15/19, with 228 cases being adjudicated and 179 cases compensated.

The September, 2019 DOJ report only lists 87 of these settlements for vaccine injuries and deaths, and 65 of those were for damages caused by the flu vaccine (see below).

Full report here.

Vaccines Cause Injuries and Deaths: But How Many?

Vaccines can cause injuries and death – this is a public health fact in spite of the corporate media’s attempts to censor these facts.

In the few instances where these facts are even mentioned, they are brushed aside with the belief that they are rare, and that the risk is worth it because more people die from the diseases being vaccinated against.

So the logic is that vaccines are necessary for the “greater good.”

Leaving aside the claim that vaccines are actually effective in preventing these diseases, which the scientific evidence actually suggests is a “belief” and not a fact based on science, the claim that vaccine injuries and deaths are “rare” really is not backed up by any verifiable data.

In November of 2014, the Government Accounting Office (GAO) issued the first report on America’s “Vaccine Court,” known as the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), in almost 15 years.

Congress gave the pharmaceutical companies immunity against lawsuits for injuries or deaths resulting in vaccines in 1986. Prior to this time, there were so many lawsuits pending against pharmaceutical companies for injuries and deaths due to vaccines, that the pharmaceutical industry basically blackmailed congress and told them that if they did not grant them legal immunity against the liabilities of vaccines, that they would quit making them.

These vaccine products cannot survive in a free market, they are so bad.

The November 2014 GAO report criticized the government for not making the public more aware that the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program exists, and that there are funds available for vaccine injuries. Therefore, the settlements represented by vaccine injuries and deaths included in the DOJ report probably represent a small fraction of the actual vaccine injuries and deaths occurring in America today.

The U.S. government keeps a database of reports documenting vaccine injuries and deaths called The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The problem is that very few medical officials ever report vaccine injuries or deaths, either because they are not trained to recognize them, or due to pressure within their profession to not report them. To admit that vaccines do cause harm is professional suicide for most doctors and medical professionals.

Hence, the quarterly DOJ report on vaccine cases only represents a tiny fraction of the actual cases that exist.

U.S. Government being Sued for Lack of Vaccine Safety

When the 1986 National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVIC) was signed into lawit had certain provisions included to make sure vaccines were regularly tested for safety, since the pharmaceutical companies were being given legal immunity due to faulty vaccines.

The federal government Health and Human Services (HHS) department is tasked with this vaccine safety reporting, and a recent lawsuit has revealed that they have failed to conduct such vaccine safety studies since the law was implemented in 1986. See:

HHS Sued for Not Upholding Vaccine Safety Testing Mandated by Law

Since these facts about vaccines are routinely censored by the pharma-financed “mainstream” media and in government hearings, most of the public is largely unaware of the 1986 NVIC, and that pharmaceutical companies cannot be sued, and that one has to sue the U.S. Government in a special vaccine court.

book-the-vaccine-court-by-wayne-rohde-large

Book – The Vaccine Court, by Wayne Rohde – 240 pages

“The Dark Truth of America’s Vaccine Injury Compensation Program”

FREE Shipping Available!

ORDER HERE!

Sunday, September 12, 2021

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis Goes Nuclear on Biden Over New COVID Mandates

 This video can be found at the following link.

https://rumble.com/vkq8ws-florida-gov.-ron-desantis-goes-nuclear-on-biden-over-new-covid-mandates-in-.html


hFlorida Gov. Ron DeSantis Goes Nuclear on Biden Over New COVID Mandates in Must-See Rant



Gov. Ron DeSantis speaks about President Biden, border security, and COVID-19

Friday, September 10, 2021

The Civil War started because of secession. Its purpose was to keep the union together.

My Facebook discussion  under a picture of a statue of Robert E Lee and his horse


The Civil War started because of secession. Its purpose was to  keep the union together.

Lincoln did not free the slaves and then go to war to enforce and ensure their freedom. 

The war was about keeping the union together and not allowing states in the south to secede. One of the big reasons, southern states wanted to secede may have been about slavery but owning slaves was not illegal. The war started because of secession and it was the union army that physically started the war by invading the southern states  in order to force them not to secede. The south did not start the war unless you consider seceding from the union to be the definition of starting the war. Most of the people who fought in the south fought because they were invaded and their homes were taken over or threatened--- not because they wanted to keep slaves and/ or slavery. Over 99% of the people in the south were NOT slave owners and many of them were dirt poor. As the union army proceeded into the south they confiscated or took over southern homes and lands by force to house and feed their armies and the owners had no choice. And they did not free the slaves when they left. They left them to starve with the rest of the people.

Lincoln freed the slaves after the war and that was a very good thing but the way it was implemented was a humanitarian disaster. wherever the slaves were and whatever the work was that they did, for most of them it was the only life they had ever owned, and they knew how to deal with it.Wherever they were given to lay their head, it was the only home they had ever known and they were fed everyday. Most slaveowners, even cruel ones fed their slaves well enough to keep performing their work. They were financiall investments and were valuable to their owners in that sense. 

Then suddenly , overnight, the entire slave population was turned our and sent away from their homes with no where to go, no place to lay their heads, no jobs to make a living and knowing very few people who could actually help them. Most of them barely survived in the beginning and many did not survive. Sharecropping became very big for a lot of them  because they could get a place to stay usually in old slave quarters, and something to eat, and a little bit of money. Some of the slave owners allowed some of those who asked to stay on and keep doing what they were doing  and get fed and get a little bit of money.

Frredom for the ex- slaves  did not start out as the glorious thing that we perceive it to be. The way it was done turned  the first days of freedom  into a harsh and bitter reality  that was barely survivable.

========================================================


B Mo Cates
"A Declaration of the Immediate Causes which Induce and Justify the Secession of the State of Mississippi from the Federal Union.
In the momentous step which our State has taken of dissolving its connection with the government of which we so long formed a part, it is but just that we should declare the prominent reasons which have induced our course.
Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the world."

----------------------------------------------------
 I did not say that slavery had nothing to do with it I was explaining a part of reality that people seem to forget about today as they oversimplify our history. I said that slavery may have been a big reason for secession BUT the war started because of secession and was fought to keep the union together. Again, I did not say sloavery had nothing to do with it, But the vast majority of people who were actually fighting on the confederate side were not fighting because of slavery. They were not there to fight for the slave owners to be able to keep their slaves. They were fighting because they were invaded, They were fighting to protet their homes and their landsThey were not fighting because of some 'high' ideal that had very little to do with them. The further away history gets the more we forget its day to day reality, And to say it was only about slavery distorts the reality of why each persons blood was spilt that adds up to more blood spolled than any other war in history . The overwheming majority of people in the south did not own slaves and they would not have voluntered to die so the relatively few rich slave owners coulld keep their slaves and neither would all those mothers have allowed their sons to go for that reason and the black regiments were not betraying their race!


  • Ursula Stegall
    And I am glad that you took the time to find that document from a part of Mississippi's history that I am not proud of, It is a shameful part but I like to deal in truth and I like to keep all of those documents in folders for future reference. I do not judge history by only todays standards, You can never understand history if that is the only way you can see it, History must be taken in context, that is by seeing the standards of the day both locally and around the world/ It is not only people that learn and grow through time but societies do too. And we have come a long way since that time in history. That is not who we are today..

LINCOLN OFFERED LEE COMMAND OF THE UNION ARMY IN 1861. Because of his reputation as one of the finest officers in the United States Army, Abraham Lincoln offered Lee the command of the Federal forces in April 1861. Lee declined and tendered his resignation from the army when the state of Virginia seceded on April 17, arguing that he could not fight against his own people.
Colonel Robert E. Lee resigns from the United States army two days after he was offered command of the Union army and three days after his native state, Virginia, seceded from the Union. Lee opposed secession, but he was a loyal son of Virginia.

Monday, September 6, 2021

well, isn;t this a famiar script?

 

The left. or global elite or the Soros, Bill Gates group, or whoever the supreme asshole group that wants to control and dictate to the world is, are not very original. I realize that the plan is the same no matter where it is. But hell , they do not vary the script even a little bit anywhere in the world,,, They use the same lies, the same false accusations, the same ideologies. They even use the same words, insults and reasoning* or lack thereof,no matter which country they are harassing. Projection seems to provide most of the content for their accusations. They don't vary the script at all. I guess we are all the same to them,  dispensable little peasants who deserve nothing, not even our own thoughts and choices  and definitey not freedom!


 From the Guardian:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/06/brazil-warning-bolsonaro-may-be-planning-military-coup-amid-rallies


Brazil: warning Bolsonaro may be planning military coup amid rallies

Former world leaders and public figures say nationwide marches are modelled on US Capitol insurrection

Jair Bolsonaro, the Brazilian president.
Jair Bolsonaro warned on 21 August that the rallies were a ‘necessary counter-coup’ against Congress and the supreme court. Photograph: Adriano Machado/Reuters
 Diplomatic editor

The Brazilian president, Jair Bolsonaro, and his allies could be preparing to mount a military coup in Brazil, according to an influential group of former presidents, prime ministers and leading public figures on the left.

An open letter claims rallies that Bolsonaro followers are staging on Tuesday represent a danger to democracy and amount to an insurrection modelled on Donald Trump supporters’ attack on the US Capitol on 6 January.

They assert the nationwide marches by Bolsonaro supporters against the supreme court and Congress, involving white supremacist groups, military police, and public officials at every level of government, are “stoking fears of a coup in the world’s third largest democracy”.

Signatories include José Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, the Spanish former prime minister, Yanis Varoufakis, the former Greek finance minister, Jeremy Corbyn, the former UK Labour leader, Fernando Lugo, the former Paraguayan president, Caroline Lucas, the British Green MP, and Adolfo Pérez Esquivel, the Argentine Nobel laureate and human rights activist.

They point out that on 10 August, Bolsonaro “directed an unprecedented military parade through the capital city of Brasília, as his allies in Congress pushed sweeping reforms to the country’s electoral system that he says are critical before the presidential elections next year”.

The president himself said on 21 August that the marches were preparation for a “necessary countercoup” against Congress and the supreme court. His message claimed that Brazil’s “communist constitution” had taken away his power, and accused “the judiciary, the left, and a whole apparatus of hidden interests” of conspiring against him.

The open letter warns: “Members of Congress in Brazil have warned that the 7 September mobilisation has been modelled on the insurrection at the US Capitol on 6 January 2021, when then-president Donald Trump encouraged his supporters to ‘stop the steal’ with false claims of electoral fraud in the 2020 presidential elections.

“We are gravely concerned about the imminent threat to Brazil’s democratic institutions – and we stand vigilant to defend them ahead of 7 September and after. The people of Brazil have struggled for decades to secure democracy from military rule. Bolsonaro must not be permitted to rob them of it now.”

Quick Guide

Brazil's dictatorship 1964-1985

Show

Other signatories include Ernesto Samper Pizano, a former president of Colombia, Cori Bush, a US Democrat House of Representatives member, Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the French presidential candidate and Manon Aubry, the French MEP.

More than 5,000 police officers will reportedly be deployed to protect Congress amid fears that it could suffer the same fate as the US Capitol after Trump’s defeat. Leftist leaders have urged their followers to avoid clashes by not holding counterprotests, while the US embassy has told citizens to steer clear.

On Thursday, the chief justice of Brazil’s supreme court, Luiz Fux, said people should be aware of the “judicial consequences of their acts”, whatever their political leanings. “Freedom of expression does not entail violence and threats,” Fux warned.

Polls show 60% of voters will not vote for Bolsanaro in any circumstances in next year’s elections with voters furious at his chaotic handling of the Covid crisis.

… we have a small favour to ask. Tens of millions have placed their trust in the Guardian’s high-impact journalism since we started publishing 200 years ago, turning to us in moments of crisis, uncertainty, solidarity and hope. More than 1.5 million readers, from 180 countries, have recently taken the step to support us financially – keeping us open to all, and fiercely independent.

With no shareholders or billionaire owner, we can set our own agenda and provide trustworthy journalism that’s free from commercial and political influence, offering a counterweight to the spread of misinformation. When it’s never mattered more, we can investigate and challenge without fear or favour.

Unlike many others, Guardian journalism is available for everyone to read, regardless of what they can afford to pay. We do this because we believe in information equality. Greater numbers of people can keep track of global events, understand their impact on people and communities, and become inspired to take meaningful action.

We aim to offer readers a comprehensive, international perspective on critical events shaping our world – from the Black Lives Matter movement, to the new American administration, Brexit, and the world's slow emergence from a global pandemic. We are committed to upholding our reputation for urgent, powerful reporting on the climate emergency, and made the decision to reject advertising from fossil fuel companies, divest from the oil and gas industries, and set a course to achieve net zero emissions by 2030.

If there were ever a time to join us, it is now. Every contribution, however big or small, powers our journalism and sustains our future. Support the Guardian from as little as $1 – it only takes a minute. Thank you.



Accepted payment methods: Visa, Mastercard, American Express and PayPal