Multi Rainbow

 

I got this picture by using my Snipping Tool on a frame 

from the following video:

Quadruple Rainbow (Time Lapse)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQv3NImzJc8

4 Latin Prayers from Dr Taylor Marshall's Podcast

Executive Order Canceling the Constitution from American Thinker

From American Thinker 

Executive Order Canceling the Constitution

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/04/executive_order_canceling_the_constitution.html

April 20, 2021

Executive Order Canceling the Constitution

By Leo Goldstein

On April 15, Preident Biden signed an Executive Order on Blocking Property with Respect to Specified Harmful Foreign Activities of the Government of the Russian Federation. Contrary to its title, this EO is not about Russia. It is designed to allow the Biden administration to deprive American citizens and organizations of their rights and property by arbitrarily linking those persons to real, imagined, or vaguely defined activities of the Russian government.

The Biden administration unilaterally makes the determination and requires neither criminal acts nor intent. The punishment is blocking assets and a prohibition on any dealing with the accused person. Spouses and adult children of individuals found guilty by accusation under this EO are punished, too.

The EO was preceded by some distracting maneuvers, both diplomatic (hostile rhetoric toward Russia) and military (sending naval ships toward the Black Sea and recalling them back, as if dealing with Russian threats). Thus, many people assumed that the EO was directed at Russia, and completely missed the fact that it is directed at dissent here, at home. 

Over the past four years, the Democrat Party, Fake News, and Big Tech have been frequently portraying their opponents as Russian trolls or Russian misinformation operators. The Russian collusion narrative, initially invented to overthrow the Trump administration, has been used to smear many conservative movements. Now this effort has been crowned by an Executive Order. 

Biden’s administration has been recently pushing so many other radical changes, such as packing the Supreme Court, eliminating the filibuster, restricting Second Amendment rights, etc., that the real ramifications of this new EO went completely unnoticed. In my opinion, this EO is the most dangerous of them all. It allows the Biden regime to eliminate its opposition, quickly and quietly.

Section 1 of the EO enumerates prohibited activities and defines guilty persons as those “determined” by the Secretary of Treasury and/or Secretary of State in consultation with the Attorney General to be:

(a)(ii) responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged or attempted to engage in, any of the following for or on behalf of, or for the benefit of, directly or indirectly, the Government of the Russian Federation: 

(A)  malicious cyber-enabled activities;

(B)  interference in a United States or other foreign government election;

(C)  actions or policies that undermine democratic processes or institutions in the United States or abroad; 

(D)  transnational corruption;

Some of the language in this EO borrows from another: EO-13224 - Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions With Persons Who Commit, Threaten To Commit, or Support Terrorism. George W. Bush signed EO-13224 on September 23, 2001, in response to 9/11.

However, Biden’s EO is as similar to Bush’s EO as an atomic bomb is to a sniper rifle. Bush’s EO targeted financing terrorism. It defined terrorism clearly and narrowly. It minimized legal jeopardy to US persons. It did not strip away the standard for criminal liability requirements of action and intent. It did not target spouses or children of accused individuals. Additionally, Bush made a legally meaningful promise to use it with due regard to culpability and the Bush administration used it with restraint. Even so, Democrats criticized it harshly, opposed it, and fought it in courts.

In contrast, Biden’s new EO is directed mostly at US persons. It criminalizes speech and political activities, based on whimsical and arbitrary definitions. The Biden administration can define “malicious activities,” “democratic processes or institutions,” and the activities that undermine them as it wants. 

The Biden administration is also free to interpret what constitutes “interests of the Russian Government.” Such broad and vague language allows the Biden regime to select US citizens and political organizations arbitrarily, and then deprive them of their property and rights without anything reminiscent of due process. The EO does not even require that anybody commit an actual crime somewhere. False cyber-attribution or fake bounty claims are sufficient. Biden’s remarks to the EO showed no regard to the culpability of any targeted US citizens or other persons.

Leftist pseudo-elites have been eager to ban speech based on allegations that such speech may be beneficial to Russia. Such ideation has been present among Big Tech influencers for a long time. This EO effectively gives Big Tech, banks, and credit card companies a new pretext to deplatform conservatives and anyone else who opposes the Biden regime by claiming that they are now engaged in illegal activity. 

Biden’s EO appears to allow the Democrat party to deny Americans the right to advocate against it in future federal elections. This might be accomplished through a “determination” that Russia is interfering in elections against democratic candidates. Thus, any US citizens who also oppose Democrats could be found to acting for Russia’s benefit, directly or indirectly. 

The list of prohibited activities justifying a Biden administration “determination” to deprive American persons of their property and other rights (referred to here as a “Deprived Person”) states:

       [a] (iii) to be or have been a leader, official, senior executive officer, or member of the board of directors of:
           …   (C)  an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order;

For comparison, Bush’s EO only covered the leaders of terrorist-supporting entities, not multiple officials, executives, or directors.

Unprecedently, Biden’s EO targets children and spouses:

[a] (v)    to be a spouse or adult child of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to subsection (a)(ii) or (iii) of this section;

and countless associations:

[a] (vi)   to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of:

(A)  any activity described in subsection (a)(ii) of this section; or

(B)  any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order ...

[a] (vii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, … any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.

Notice the infinite reach these subsections afford. Those connected to a “Deprived Person” can receive the same designation, and so on. There is no limit to the number of iterations. 

“Deprived Persons” essentially become untouchables, as dealing with them in any way is expressly prohibited without additional determinations:

Sec. 2.  The prohibitions in section 1 of this order include:

(a)  the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and

(b)  the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Giving legal representation, hosting the website, selling food, and giving medical care to a “Deprived Person” is automatically prohibited. Section 4 prohibits transactions that “cause a violation” of this EO, even absent intent or knowledge. This serves as a hint to pre-emptively cut ties with anyone the Biden regime targets.

Section 9 exempts UN bodies and “related organizations” (NGOs) from any responsibility for interfering in US elections and other activities under this order.

The Russian Federation is mixed into the EO only for distraction and as a primer, triggering expanding layers of culpability. 

I do not expect any putative human rights organizations or large media outlets to hold the Biden regime accountable for how it applies this EO or to defend its victims. So far, these outlets have either ignored it or defended it.

Image by Andrea Widburg

To comment, you can find the MeWe post for this article here.

If you would like to comment on this or any other American Thinker article or post, we invite you to visit the American Thinker Forum at MeWe. There, you can converse with other American Thinker readers and comment freely (subject to MeWe's terms of use). The Forum will be fully populated and ready for comments by midday (Eastern time) each day
.

 

From Frontiers in Physiology

Excited Delirium and Sudden Death: A Syndromal Disorder at the Extreme End of the Neuropsychiatric Continuum

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5061757/

==============================================================

Front Physiol. 2016; 7: 435.

Published online 2016 Oct 13. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00435

PMCID: PMC5061757

PMID: 27790150

Excited Delirium and Sudden Death: A Syndromal Disorder at the Extreme End of the Neuropsychiatric Continuum

Deborah C. Mash*

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

Go to:

Abstract

Over the past decade, the excited delirium syndrome (ExDS) has raised continued controversy regarding the cause and manner of death of some highly agitated persons held in police custody, restrained or incapacitated by electrical devices. At autopsy, medical examiners have difficulty in identifying an anatomic cause of death, but frequently cite psychostimulant intoxication as a contributing factor. The characteristic symptoms of ExDS include bizarre and aggressive behavior, shouting, paranoia, panic, violence toward others, unexpected physical strength, and hyperthermia. Throughout the United States and Canada, these cases are most frequently associated with cocaine, methamphetamine, and designer cathinone abuse. Acute exhaustive mania and sudden death presents with behavioral symptoms that are identical to what is described for ExDS in psychostimulant abusers. Bell's mania or acute exhaustive mania was first described in the 1850's by American psychiatrist Luther Bell in institutionalized psychiatric patients. This rare disorder of violent mania, elevated body temperature and autonomic collapse continued to be described by others in the psychiatric literature, but with different names until the first cases of ExDS were seen at the beginning of the cocaine epidemic by medical examiners. The neurochemical pathology examination of brain tissues after death revealed a loss of dopamine transporter regulation together with increases in heat shock protein 70 (hsp70) expression as a biomarker of hyperthermia. The similarity in the behavioral symptoms between extremely agitated psychostimulant abusers and unmedicated psychiatric patients suggests that a genetic disorder that leads to dysregulated central dopamine transporter function could be a precipitating cause of the acute delirium and sudden death. While the precise cause and mechanism of lethality remains controversial, the likely whys and wherefores of sudden death of ExDS victims are seen to be “biological,” since excessive dopamine in the brain triggers the manic excitement and delirium, which unabated, culminates in a loss of autonomic function that progresses to cardiorespiratory collapse.

Keywords: delirium, CNS, neurocardiac, dopamine, dopamine transporter, mania, cocaine

Go to:

Inset

Henry Maudsley MD described Acute Mania and Acute Maniacal Delirium in 1867 in his “Physiology and Pathology of the Mind,” which best illustrates the view discussed in this article. He suggests that persons in an agitated state of acute mania benefit from “abundant exercise in the open air” while “such a practice would be most unscientific in acute delirium, and very likely to be followed by fatal consequences”. He further states “it would be better to place a patient suffering from such acute degeneration of cerebral function entirely in seclusion” rather “than to aggravate his disorder by forced exercise and mischievous struggles with attendants”. Medico-legal reports more than a hundred and fifty years after Maudsley and Luther Bell find the prognosis is never very favorable for individuals at risk for excited delirium.

Go to:

Historical descriptions and case reports

Psychiatrists in the United Kingdom, France and America were the first to provide clinical descriptions and case reports of persons in states of acute exhaustive mania and delirium. In the 1800s, Dr. Luther Bell, psychiatrist at the McLean Asylum for the Insane in Massachusetts described a clinical condition with a 75 percent mortality rate. “Bell's mania” or acute exhaustive mania was characterized by delusions, hallucinations, hyperactivity, and frequent fevers. The descriptions although similar to the psychotic features of paranoid schizophrenics (e.g., hallucinations and delusions) revealed a more extreme condition of generalized severe disorganization of behavior, including hyperactive arousal, altered sleep-wake cycle, and elevated core body temperature. Calmeil's report of an uncommon, but life threating psychosis with extreme hyperactivity and mounting fear fading to stuperous exhaustion in 1832 was followed by Maudleys' description of the same disorder in 1867 (inset). Agitated delirium signs and symptoms were reported in hyperactive or mixed forms of the disorder throughout the pre-neuroleptic era of psychiatry (Kraines, 1934; Stauder, 1934; Larson, 1939).

In 1934, Stauder published detailed observations of 27 cases, which became the definitive description of a syndrome that he termed lethal catatonia (Stauder, 1934). The cases were mostly young people, in the age range of 18–26 years, who had no significant premorbid psychological or physical disturbances. Stauder observed the acute onset of a severe form of psychomotor agitation that he called “elementary catatonic excitement.” Various degrees of clouding of consciousness and a strong tendency toward violent and self-destructive acts also were present. Although different nomenclature was used to describe a psychotic exhaustion syndrome, fatal cases of a life-threatening febrile neuropsychiatric disorder were widely recognized and reported by clinicians before modern psychiatric treatments became available (Shulack, 1946). The authors of these published reports found it remarkable that autopsies of these patients failed to reveal any clues to etiology or the cause of death, other than exhaustion.

Between 1954 and 1975, the advent of the neuroleptic drugs like Thorazine transformed psychiatric practice and reduced the incidence of exhaustive mania in institutionalized and unmedicated patients. However, the cocaine epidemic of the 1980's lead to a series of case reports describing sudden death in cocaine abusers with an extreme behavioral malady similar to what had been reported by Bell and others 150 years earlier. The agitated cocaine delirium deaths were associated with cocaine abuse and their appearance coincided with the introduction of cocaine into the United States (Fishbain and Wetli, 1981; Wetli, 1987). The trans-shipment of cocaine to South Florida through the Bahamian corridor and the increased incidence of cocaine-related medical emergency room admissions and drug related deaths placed Medical Examiners in Miami-Dade at the forefront of a new wave of cocaine-related excited delirium deaths.

Wetli and Fishbain (1985) described a case series of psychosis and sudden death in cocaine abusers, which was the first report of drug-related excited delirium (Table ​(Table1).1). The deaths occurred mostly in young cocaine intoxicated males, who exhibited extreme hyperactivity and violent behavior, hyperthermia and sudden cardiorespiratory collapse. Because these patients always presented with agitated and bizarre behavior, law enforcement was often called to the scene. The typical course was that after police restrained the individual, they died unexpectedly and suddenly following the use of various force methods, including maximal restraints, baton strikes, or use of noxious chemical “pepper” sprays (Wetli, 1987; Ross, 1998; Stratton et al., 2001). Medical examiner review of these cases did not reveal a definite anatomic cause of death, although drug overdose, trauma, and underlying cardiac disease were excluded (Wetli, 1987; Ruttenber et al., 1997; Stephens et al., 2004).

Table 1

Historical descriptions and terminology of excited delirium syndrome.

Author and year	Nomenclature	Clinical description
Calmeil, 1832	Delirious mania	Rare, life-threatening psychosis extreme hyperactivity, mounting fear, stuporous exhaustion
Bell, 1849	Bell's mania	Sudden onset of hyperactive arousal, confusion, transient hallucinations, core body temperature dysregulation, 75% mortality rate
Maudsley, 1867	Acute maniacal delirium	Violent mania, rapid pulse, constant motion, elevated temperature of skin, complete exhaustion
Stauder, 1934	Lethal catatonia	Intense motor excitement, violent, suicide attempts, intermittent rigidity, incoherent speech, bizarre delusions; fever (43.3°C), cardiovascular collapse
Wetli and Fishbain, 1985	Excited delirium	Agitation motor excitement, super human strength, paranoia, mounting fear, hyperthermia, cardiorespiratory collapse, cocaine intoxication, no anatomic cause of death

Open in a separate window

Go to:

Fatal cocaine delirium as a variant of the neuroleptic malignant syndrome

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare, life-threatening idiosyncratic reaction to antipsychotic drugs characterized by fever, altered mental status, muscle rigidity, and autonomic dysfunction (Levenson, 1985; Weinberger and Kelly, 1977; Berman, 2011). The hallmark symptoms of NMS include hyperpyrexia and muscular rigidity, while the cocaine-associated syndrome is atypical in having minimal rigidity. Based on these similarities, Kosten and Kleber (1988) proposed that cocaine-induced excited delirium should be considered a dopamine agonist variant of NMS. Wetli (2005) proposed that NMS might be an attenuated form of acute exhaustive mania/excited delirium. These observations lead him to hypothesize that there may be three related syndromes: (1) acute exhaustive mania, as described by Bell in psychiatric patients, (2), excited delirium, due to psychostimulants; and (3) the attenuated variant—NMS (for review, Wetli, 2005).

Delirious mania and malignant catatonia both have non-malignant and malignant clinical features with early, non-malignant symptoms responding to neuroleptics, while patients who pass over into the malignant phase require sedation by benzodiazepines (Mann et al., 2013). Although NMS is a rare, life-threatening idiosyncratic reaction associated with virtually all neuroleptics, including the newer atypical antipsychotics (e.g., dopamine blockers), the condition is linked also to the use of indirect and direct-acting dopamine agonists. The abrupt cessation or reduction in dose of dopaminergic agonists, such as levodopa, pergolide, and amantadine in Parkinson's disease may precipitate NMS in vulnerable patients (Ito et al., 2001; Reimer et al., 2002). Interestingly, the akinetic crisis of Parkinson's disease is associated with a severe loss of striatal dopamine transporter function (Kasssinen et al., 2014). This rare condition is a life-threatening complication of Parkinson's disease, with an estimated annual incidence of 0.3% and death rate of 15%, that is associated with hyperthermia, dysautonomia, and increased serum muscle enzymes (Takubo et al., 2003; Onofrj et al., 2009). The clinical picture is similar to that of NMS and has been termed as the malignant syndrome of parkinsonism-hyperpyrexia. The condition is not related to disease stage or medication dosage, but one of the main features is that, the akinetic crisis appears to be long lasting (on average 11 days) and the dopamine system is transiently blocked from treatments, which would usually give patients rapid motor benefit. To date, none of the theories put forth as the underlying cause of the NMS related syndrome in Parkinson's disease have been able to explain why only a small fraction of patients exposed to dopaminergic agonists develop the condition, although state (dopaminergic drugs) and trait (genetic) vulnerabilities are likely risk factors.

Hypothalamic dopamine antagonism leads to the elevated set point for thermoregulation and the myotoxicity associated with malignant hyperthermia. Sympathoadrenal hyperactivity and the loss of hierarchical integration and homeostatic control may constitute important risk factors for NMS and its associated variants. Gurrera (1999) advanced this hypothesis, suggesting that sympathetic nervous system hyperactivity should be viewed as primary in the etiology of NMS. The sympathetic nervous system mediates the hypothalamic coordination of thermoregulatory activity and is a regulator of muscle tone and thermogenesis. The sympathetic nervous system's latent capacity for autonomous activity is expressed when tonic inhibitory inputs from higher central nervous system dopaminergic centers are disrupted. The predominant sources of spinal dopamine are the descending fibers projecting from the dopaminergic A10 and A11 cell groups of the posterior hypothalamus (Skagerberg and Lindvall, 1985; Qu et al., 2006). These tonic inhibitory inputs relay to preganglionic sympathetic neurons by way of the dopaminergic hypothalamospinal tracts.

A predisposition to more extreme sympathetic nervous system activation and/or dysfunction in response to emotional or psychological stress may be an underlying state vulnerability for NMS, as well as, for the ExDS associated with psychostimulant abuse. State variables like the acute psychic stress reported originally in Bell's mania when coupled with a loss of presynaptic dopaminergic transporter function may lead to extremely elevated concentrations of synaptic dopamine, and the emergence of related clinical syndromes.

Go to:

Excited delirium is a syndromal disorder of dysregulated dopamine

A syndrome is the association of several clinically recognizable features, signs, symptoms, or characteristics that often occur together, so that the presence of one feature alerts to the presence of the others. Most recognize that the condition of excited delirium represents a syndromal disorder rather than a specific disease. What has not been emphasized in the literature is that various organic brain disorders, as well as functional psychiatric conditions and psychostimulant abuse, contribute to the expression of a CNS disorder with high fatality rates that share a common underlying neurochemical dysregulation of central dopamine homeostasis.

Persons at risk for excited delirium are most likely at the extreme end of the neuropsychiatric continuum of several DSM-IV recognized disorders, including delirium induced by a drug, manic excitement, and psychomotor agitation (Vilke et al., 2012). Those at risk for excited delirium and sudden death include people who are withdrawing from or non-compliant with psychotropic drugs, substance abusers suffering from reward deficiency syndrome or alcoholics in withdrawal, and persons suffering from acute manic episodes that may be triggered or worsened by sleep deprivation.

The clinical description of excited delirium includes reports of increasing excitement with wild agitation and violent, often destructive behavior that can last for hours to days. The forensic pathology descriptions suggest that the disorder can wax and wane in severity over time with rigidity or stupor alternating with excitement (Wetli, 2005; DiMaio and DiMaio, 2006). These progress to increasing and possible fluctuations of fever and persistent autonomic instability with rapid and weak pulse and hypotension. Cocaine delirium shares clinical similarity to the acute onset of excitement, grandiosity, emotional lability, delusions, and insomnia associated with emergence of mania, and the disorientation and altered consciousness characteristic of delirium. Psychostimulant intoxication, drug withdrawal states, and undiagnosed mania and bipolar affective disorder are the most commonly reported antecedents (Wetli, 2005; Mash et al., 2009; Vilke et al., 2012).

Go to:

Pathophysiology and neurochemical triggers

Transmission of reward signals is a function of dopamine, a neurotransmitter known to be involved in the mechanism of psychosis. The symptoms of psychosis and mania are both related to dopaminergic hyperactivity in brain circuits implicated in neuropsychiatric disorders (Cipriani et al., 2011). In psychosis, post-synaptic receptor sensitization causes dysfunctional neural processing, leading to the development of delusional symptoms. This understanding fits well with the traditional hyperdopaminergic hypothesis of psychosis and schizophrenia. The hyperdopaminergia and disordered signaling in dopamine target regions of the brain also serves as a model for mania, since dopaminergic blocking drugs are effective in alleviating mania and psychosis.

Mania is the cardinal feature and a core symptom of bipolar disorder. PET scans in medicated, manic patients show abnormal brain activation in dorsal anterior cingulate, frontal polar, and right inferior frontal cortical regions (Rubinsztein et al., 2001). The increase in task-related anterior cingulate activation was positively correlated in this study with the severity of manic symptoms. Anterior cingulate cortex activation may be related to increased nucleus accumbens dopamine signaling, which leads to cortical and subcortical hyperactivity in mania (Perry et al., 2001). Genetic linkage studies have suggested an association of the dopamine transporter gene (Kelsoe et al., 1996; Greenwood et al., 2001, 2006) and lower levels of transporter protein expression in patients with bipolar affective disorder (Amsterdam and Newberg, 2007).

Cocaine and methamphetamine increase extracellular dopamine and produce behavioral effects similar to mania (Silverstone et al., 1983). Drug sensitization occurs in drug addiction, and is defined as an increased effect of a drug following repeated doses (the opposite of drug tolerance). Such sensitization involves increased brain mesolimbic dopamine transmission, as well as altered protein expression within mesolimbic dopamine neurons. Repeated treatment with psychostimulants leads to sensitization or reverse tolerance in animal models (Post and Rose, 1976; Hooks et al., 1994; Pierce and Kalivas, 1997; Zapata et al., 2003) and human cocaine abusers (Ujike and Sato, 2004; Seeman, 2011). Paranoia in the context of cocaine abuse is common and potentially dangerous and several lines of evidence suggest that this phenomenon may be related to loss of function of the dopamine transporter protein (Gelernter et al., 1994; van Dyck et al., 2005). These observations suggest that certain dopamine transporter genotypes might predispose to paranoia with chronic psychostimulant abuse.

The dopamine transporter undergoes neurobiological adaptations with chronic abuse of cocaine, depending on the duration, amount and pattern of use (e.g., binge vs. daily use). Intermittent cocaine self-administration in rodents produces sensitization of the stimulant effects of cocaine at the dopamine transporter (Calipari et al., 2014) and enhanced locomotor responsiveness or what is termed behavioral sensitization (Kalivas and Duffy, 1993; Robinson and Berridge, 1993; Kalivas et al., 1998). This phenomenon is not unique to cocaine; other psychomotor stimulants, some other classes of drugs, and mental stress induce the phenomenon of behavioral sensitization. Since cocaine directly inhibits dopamine reuptake by binding to the transporter, repeated cocaine administration may lead to a reduced potency of cocaine, which leads to an elevation in synaptic dopamine and the expression of behavioral sensitization (Zahniser et al., 1995, 1998).

The dopamine transporter expressed in presynaptic terminals of dopamine neurons regulates reuptake of dopamine from the synaptic cleft and keeps extracellular dopamine concentrations low (Amara and Kuhar, 1993; Giros and Caron, 1993; Mortensen and Amara, 2003). The dopamine transporter is critical in regulating the concentration of extracellular dopamine and overall dopaminergic tone (Mash and Staley, 1996; Drevits et al., 1999; Mash et al., 2002, 2009). By blocking the transporter protein, cocaine allows released dopamine to persist in the extracellular space, which prolongs dopamine receptor stimulation (Figure ​(Figure1).1). A decrease in dopamine transporter numbers or function in response to cocaine leads to reduced dopamine reuptake, elevated synaptic dopamine, and increased dopamine signaling at postsynaptic receptors.

Open in a separate window

Figure 1

Dysregulated dopamine transporter function in ExDS. Located on presynaptic dopamine nerve terminals, the dopamine transporter functions to regulate the duration and intensity of synaptic dopamine signaling (left). Cocaine (red) inhibits the reuptake of dopamine by blocking the transporter protein (center). With chronic cocaine abuse, the dopamine transporter is trafficked to the plasma membrane as a compensatory adaptation to increases in synaptic dopamine. In ExDS victims, there is a loss of dopamine transporter regulation, which causes dopamine overflow in the synapse (right). The elevated synaptic dopamine leads to a state of hyperdopaminergia, that is associated with the intense motor excitement, paranoia, bizarre, and often violent behavior. DAT, dopamine transporter; DA, dopamine; D2, D2 dopamine receptor; D3, D3 dopamine receptor.

The syndrome of excited delirium in drug abusers demonstrates that cocaine is the most frequent reported illicit drug (Ruttenber et al., 1997; Mash et al., 2009; Vilke et al., 2012). Most drug-related excited delirium victims are chronic freebase cocaine (“crack”) abusers, usually engaged in a “binge” pattern of drug use (Mash et al., 2002, 2009; Wetli, 2005). These persons use large amounts of “crack” cocaine or methamphetamine often for days, which interrupts normal sleep-wake cycles. Inhibition of dopamine transporter function is thought to be the primary mechanism underlying cocaine's addictive effects (Ritz et al., 1987). Although excited delirium is most frequently reported in cocaine abusers, psychostimulants including, methamphetamine, MDMA, alpha-PVP, methylome, and ephedrine have been associated with the syndrome (Mash et al., 2009; Penders et al., 2012). These psychostimulants directly interact with the dopamine transporter to cause a marked increase in the levels of synaptic dopamine.

Postmortem neurochemical studies of the human brain at autopsy demonstrate that chronic cocaine abuse leads to a compensatory upregulation of dopamine transporter number and function (Staley et al., 1994; Little et al., 1999; Mash et al., 2002). In contrast, there was no compensatory upregulation in dopamine transporter numbers in a case series of 90 cocaine-related excited delirium and exhaustive mania victims (Mash et al., 2009). The cocaine-related excited delirium cases occurred in persons who had reported histories of chronic cocaine abuse, consistent with the quantification of benzoylecgonine in blood and cocaine and benzoylecgonine measured in brain at autopsy (Mash et al., 2009). Mean core body temperature among the 90 victims was 40.7°C. Although the majority tested positive for cocaine, four had no licit or illicit drugs or alcohol measured in blood at autopsy. Forensic review of these four cases reported the cause of death as acute exhaustive mania, similar to the original description reported by Bell (1849).

All psychostimulants (e.g., cocaine, methamphetamine, and MDMA) increase the synaptic levels of dopamine (Amara and Kuhar, 1993; Giros and Caron, 1993), which may explain why chronic psychostimulant abusers are more at risk for exhibiting the behavioral symptoms associated with ExDS. A central role of dopamine is to mediate the “salience” of environmental events and internal representations in a dynamic process characterized by time and stimulus-dependent neural regulation (Kapur, 2003; Howes and Kapur, 2009). Dopamine can enhance both approach and avoidance behaviors and trigger extreme fear (Faure et al., 2008). In chronic cocaine abusers, there is a compensatory upregulation in dopamine transporter function, which is an adaptive increase to offset dopamine overflow in the synapse (Figure ​(Figure1).1). When this homeostatic control of synaptic dopamine fails, it leads to a functional hyperdopaminergia, which triggers the acute onset of delirium and marked agitation in ExDS victims (Staley et al., 1996; Wetli et al., 1996; Mash et al., 2002, 2009).

Rhabdomyolysis secondary to mania and cocaine excited delirium is related to extreme physical exertion, although increased sympathetic tone during manic states and elevated epinephrine also play a role in its development (Manchip and Hurel, 1995; Ruttenber et al., 1999). Ruttenber et al. (1999) suggested that cocaine-associated rhabdomyolysis and excited delirium are components of the same syndrome and share the same initiating factors and pathophysiologic processes. Both hyperthermia and hyperactivity play important roles in the evolution of cocaine-associated rhabdomyolysis and excited delirium. Interestingly, in NMS, the elevated risk for hyperthermia results from disordered dopamine signaling precipitated by chronic administration of neuroleptic drugs (Strawn et al., 2007). The hyperthermia of neuroleptic malignant syndrome is associated with psychomotor agitation, and both syndromes have been related to increases in dopamine concentrations involved in thermoregulation and neuromuscular homeostasis (Keck et al., 1989).

Some undiagnosed psychiatric patients or those who are neuroleptic medication non-compliant may be at increased risk for excited delirium and sudden cardiac death. Dopamine transporter numbers fall below the normal homeostatic range for regulating dopamine in all cases of fatal excited delirium, including those with no known history of drug abuse and a negative toxicology screen at autopsy. These results suggest that the unabated conditions, which favor the development of excited delirium, are psychostimulant abuse, extreme mental stress or an underlying, or perhaps undiagnosed psychiatric condition.

A final common pathway for excited delirium related to chronic stimulant drug abuse, extreme environmental stress or acute mania of bipolar disorder might be a failure of the dopamine transporter to dynamically regulate synaptic dopamine. This failure of regulation leads to a hyperdopaminergic state, which triggers the violent behavior, delirium, agitation, and motor excitement. Dopamine systems in the brain also play a role in temperature regulation (Mann and Boger, 1978). The rise in core body temperature is most likely induced by dopamine stimulation of D1 receptors in the human hypothalamus which occurs because of a downregulation in D2 mediated hypothermia (Mash, 2009). A dopamine transporter murine model of hyperdopaminergia displays a distinctive cardiorespiratory and thermal phenotype, providing further support for altered dopamine transporter regulation in excited delirium (Vincent et al., 2007). Dopamine also regulates sleep and arousal, suggesting that there might be an inter-relationship between thermal behavior and circadian rhythms mediated by disrupted CNS dopamine signaling in excited delirium.

Go to:

When neurocardiac signals turn lethal

Mental and emotional stress is expressed in the brain as fluctuations in the activity of a subset of brain regions, including the insula, cingulate cortex, and amygdala (Critchley, 2009). These regions serve as an interface between emotional feeling states and visceral responses of the body. The insula and cingulate are viscerosensory cortices, which function to regulate attention and autonomic arousal. The amygdala is important in detecting and learning threat even in the absence of conscious awareness. The insula and cingulate cortices and subcortical regions of the limbic brain are heavily innervated by dopaminergic projections from the ventral tegmental nucleus (Gaspar, 1989). These closely connected brain regions together with the dorsal and ventral striatum are viewed as a “salience network,” acting directly on hypothalamic and brainstem centers to increase our bodily arousal state through direct coupling with sympathetic and parasympathetic efferent nuclei and feedback control loops located in the brainstem.

The insular cortex and the infralimbic cortex are part of a network involved in the descending control of the cardiovascular system (for review, Cechetto, 2013). These forebrain regions are responsible for integrating emotional and cognitive aspects related to cardiovascular responses. Together with the autonomic nervous system nuclei of the brainstem, these forebrain regions regulate cardiac function and electrophysiology via direct neural influences. Taggart et al. (2011) suggest that the roles of mental stress and emotion in arrhythmogenesis and sudden cardiac death are no longer confined to the realm of anecdote, but should be viewed as contributors to the pathophysiology of cardiac sudden death. Sympathetic arousal magnifies the electrophysiological effects of ischemia (for review, Taggart et al., 2011) and abnormal brain activity during seizures is associated with abnormalities of cardiac repolarization, and peri-ictal VT/VF in the absence of any visible cardiovascular disease (Taggart, 2013). A centrally triggered arrhythmia is a likely cause of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (Surges et al., 2010), and a similar neurocardiac mechanism could underlie the sudden cardiac collapse in ExDS.

An emerging theme from animal models of asphyxia and cardiac arrest supports the notion that the autonomic nervous system is under constant surveillance by the cerebral cortex to ensure functional integrity of vital organs (Borjigin et al., 2013). A life-threatening crisis of the heart, with a rapid and steep change in heart rate and cardiac output, markedly activates and recruits the cerebral cortex to form a hierarchical circuit of cardiac survival. When transient homeostatic feedback from the brain to the heart is insufficient to restore cardiac function, the brain may exhibit a sustained activation that causes a premature and rapid death of the heart (Li et al., 2015).

Dopamine (DA) is an immediate precursor of noradrenaline that has stimulatory or inhibitory effects on a variety of adrenergic receptors. Dopamine also suppresses responsiveness to hypoxia, both in the carotid bodies and in the CNS (Huey et al., 2000). Although the physiological relevance is not established, one possibility is that suppression of stimulatory responsiveness to hypoxia is a protective mechanism directed against excessive discharge activity in the CNS respiratory network, which can result in neuronal excitotoxicity (Richter et al., 2000, for review Lalley, 2008). In the rat asphyxia model of cardiac sudden death, at as early as time 0, a sevenfold elevation in dopamine levels is measured by microdialysis with increased 3-MT (3-methoxytyramine) and decreased DOPAC (3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid) concentrations. Since hyperdopaminergia is a condition of ExDS, the increase in synaptic dopamine may account for the decreased respiratory rate caused by dysfunctional adaptations in respiratory network rhythm.

Victims of ExDS usually die from cardiopulmonary arrest (Takeuchi et al., 2011; Vilke et al., 2012). Sudden cardiac death induced by a life-threatening stressor results from a generalized sympathetic storm within the autonomic nervous system (Samuels, 2007). Consistent with this view, exposure to carbon dioxide leads to an immediate systemic surge of neurally released dopamine and norepinephrine in asphyxic rats (Li et al., 2015). Experimental brain stimulation of the left insula can induce QT prolongation, bradycardia, and pulse-less asystole (Oppenheimer et al., 1991; for review, Taggart, 2013), similar to the sudden loss of vital signs with asystole reported in ExDS victims (Vilke et al., 2012). Life-threatening stress can lead to sudden cardiac death in people with no previous history of abnormal heart and brain function (Samuels, 2007; Sharkey et al., 2011). These observations suggest that autonomic toxicity induced by central hyperdopaminergic activity in ExDS may hasten the demise of heart function (Samuels, 2007; Li et al., 2015).

Go to:

Conclusions

Elevated synaptic dopamine when coupled with failed dopamine transporter function leads to agitation, paranoia and violent behaviors associated with ExDS. CNS dopamine also regulates heart rate, respiration, and core body temperature with chemical imbalance resulting in tachycardia, tachypnea, and hyperthermia. Hyperthermia is a hallmark of excited delirium and a harbinger of death in this syndromal disorder. Victims of excited delirium are in an extremely heightened emotional state exhibiting marked paranoia and mounting irrational fear. Abnormal signaling in the brain-heart axis may be a precipitant of a sudden fatal arrhythmia, since hyperdopaminergic signaling in the limbic system can convert extreme emotional stress into autonomic toxicity. The connection between the hyperdopaminergia and chaotic signaling in higher brain autonomic regulatory centers may explain the abrupt loss of autonomic function that leads to sudden unexpected death in victims of the ExDS.

Excited delirium is a syndromal disorder, which is controversial and highly debated precisely because the mechanism of lethality is unknown. However, molecular studies of the brain of autopsy victims who died in states of excited delirium reveal a loss of dopamine transporter function as a possible trigger of a lethal cascade of neural activities that progress to asphyxia and sudden cardiac arrest. Both national and regional ExDS registries are needed with data about medical history, toxicology, gender, and race to improve outcomes and further translational molecular research studies of this highly disputed and often unrecognized psychopathological condition associated with central dopamine dysfunction.

Go to:

Author contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and approved it for publication.

Go to:

Funding

The original studies were funded by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) (DA06227; DA033684).

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Go to:

References

• Amara S. G., Kuhar M. J. (1993). Neurotransmitter transporters: recent progress. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 16, 73–93. 10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.000445 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Amsterdam J. D., Newberg A. B. (2007). Differences in dopamine transporter density in patients with bipolar type II and unipolar major depressive episode. Neuropsychobiology 55, 167–170. 10.1159/000106476 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Bell L. V. (1849). On a form of disease resembling some advanced stages of mania and fever. Am. J. Insanity 6, 97–127. [Google Scholar]
• Berman B. D. (2011). Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a review for neurohospitalists. Neurohospitalist 1, 41–47. 10.1177/1941875210386491 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Borjigin J., UnCheol L., Tiecheng L., Dinesh P., Huff S., Klarr D., et al. . (2013). Surge of neurophysiological coherence and connectivity in the dying brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 14432–14437. 10.1073/pnas.1308285110 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Calipari E. S., Ferris M. J., Siciliano C. A., Zimmer A. B., Jones S. R. (2014). Intermittent cocaine self-admininstrationn produces sensitization of stimulant effects at the dopamine transporter. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 349, 192–198. 10.1124/jpet.114.212993 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Calmeil L. F. (1832). Dietionnaire de Medecine ou Repertoire General des Sciences. Medicales sous Ie Rapport Theorique et Praetique, 2nd Edn Bechet, Paris. [Google Scholar]
• Cechetto D. F. (2013). Cortical control of the autonomic nervous system. Exp. Physiol. 99, 326–331. 10.1113/expphysiol.2013.075192 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Cipriani A., Barbui C., Salanti G., Rendell J., Brown R., Stockton S., et al. . (2011). Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antimanic drugs in acute mania: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Lancet 378, 1306–1315. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60873-8 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Critchley H. D. (2009). Psychophysiology of neural, cognitive and affective integration: fMRIand autonomic indicants. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 73, 88–94. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.01.012 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• DiMaio T. G., DiMaio V. J. M. (2006). Excited Delirium Syndrome: Cause of Death and Prevention. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis. [Google Scholar]
• Drevits W. C., Price J. C., Kupfer D. J., Kinahan P. E., Lopresti B., Holt D., et al. (1999). PET measures of amphetamine-induced release in ventral versus dorsal striatum. Neuropsychopharmacology 221, 694–709. 10.1016/S0893-133X(99)00079-2 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Faure A., Reynolds S. M., Richard J. M., Berridge K. C. (2008). Mesolimbic dopamine in desire and dread: enabling motivation to be generated by localized glutamate disruptions in nucleus accumbens. J. Neurosci. 28, 7184–7192. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4961-07.2008 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Fishbain D., Wetli C. V. (1981). Cocaine intoxication, delirium, and death in a body packer. Ann. Emerg. Med. 10, 531–532. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Gaspar P. (1989). Catecholamine innervation of the human cerebral-cortex as revealed by comparative immunohistochemistry of tyrosine-hydroxylase and dopamine-β-hydroxylase. J. Comp. Neurol. 279, 249–271. 10.1002/cne.902790208 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Gelernter J., Kranzler H. R., Satel S. L., Rao P. A. (1994). Genetic association between dopamine transporter protein alleles and cocaine-induced paranoia. Neuropsychopharmacology 11, 195–200. 10.1038/sj.npp.1380106 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Giros B., Caron M. G. (1993). Molecular characterization of the dopamine transporter. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 14, 43–49. 10.1016/0165-6147(93)90029-J [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Greenwood T. A., Alexander M., Keck P. E., McElroy S., Sadovnick A. D., Remick R. A., et al. . (2001). Evidence for linkage disequilibrium between the dopamine transporter and bipolar disorder. Am. J. Med. Genet. 105, 145–151. 10.1002/1096-8628(2001)9999:9999<::AID-AJMG1161>3.0.CO;2-8 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Greenwood T. A., Schork N. J., Eskin E., Kelsoe J. R. (2006). Identification of additional variants within the human dopamine transporter gene provides further evidence for an association with bipolar disorder in two independent samples. Mol. Psychiatry 11, 125–133. 10.1038/sj.mp.4001764 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Gurrera R. J. (1999). Sympathoadrenal hyperactivity and the etiology of neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Am. J. Psychiatry 156, 169–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Hooks M. S., Duffy P., Striplin C., Kalivas P. W. (1994). Behavioral and neurochemical sensitization following cocaine self-administration. Psychopharmacology 115, 265–272. 10.1007/BF02244782 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Howes O. D., Kapur S. (2009). The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia: version III—the final common pathway. Schizophr. Bull. 35, 549–562. 10.1093/schbul/sbp006 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Huey K. A., Brown I. P., Jordan M. C., Powell F. L. (2000). Changes in dopamine D2-receptor modulation of the hypoxic ventilatory response with chronic hypoxia. Respir. Physiol. 123, 177–187. 10.1016/S0034-5687(00)00175-4 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Ito T., Shibata K., Watanabe A., Akabane J. (2001). Neuroleptic malignant syndrome following withdrawal of amantadine in a patient with influenza A encephalopathy. Eur. J. Pediatr. 160, 401. 10.1007/s004310100743 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Kalivas P. W., Duffy P. (1993). Time course of extracellular dopamine and behavioral sensitization to cocaine. I. Dopamine axon terminals. J. Neurosci. 13, 266–275. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Kalivas P. W., Pierce R. C., Cornish J., Sorg B. A. (1998). A role for sensitization in craving and relapse in cocaine addiction. J. Psychopharmacol. 12, 49–53. 10.1177/026988119801200107 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Kapur S. (2003). Psychosis as a state of aberrant salience: a framework linking biology, phenomenology, and pharmacology in schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 160, 13–23. 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.13 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Kasssinen V., Joutsa J., Noponen T., Paivarinta M. (2014). Akinetic crisis in Parkinson's disease is associated with a severe loss of striatal dopamine transporter function: a report of two cases. Case Rep. Neurol. 6, 275–280. 10.1159/000369448 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Keck P. E., Jr., Pope H. G., Jr., Cohen B. M., McElroy S. L., Nierenberg A. A. (1989). Risk factors for neuroleptic malignant syndrome. A case-control study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 46, 914–918. 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810100056011 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Kelsoe J. R., Sadovnick A. D., Kristbjarnarson H., Bergesch P., Mroczkowski-Parker Z., Drennan M., et al. . (1996). Possible locus for bipolar disorder near the dopamine transporter on chromosome 5. Am. J. Med. Genet. 67, 533–540. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Kosten T. R., Kleber H. D. (1988). Rapid death during cocaine abuse: a variant of the neuroleptic malignant syndrome? Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 14, 335–346. 10.3109/00952998809001555 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Kraines S. H. (1934). Bell's mania (acute delirium). Am. J. Psychiatry 91, 29–40. 10.1176/ajp.91.1.29 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Lalley P. M. (2008). Opioidergic and dopaminergic modulation of respiration. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 164, 160–167. 10.1016/j.resp.2008.02.004 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Larson C. P. (1939). Fatal cases of acute manic-depressive psychosis. Am. J. Psychiatry 95, 971–982. 10.1176/ajp.95.4.971 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Levenson J. L. (1985). Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Am. J. Psychiatry 142, 1137–1145. 10.1176/ajp.142.10.1137 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Li D., Mabrouk O. S., Liu T., Tian F., Xu G., Rengifo S., et al. . (2015). Asphyxia-activated corticocardiac signaling accelerates onset of cardiac arrest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, E2073–E2082. 10.1073/pnas.1423936112 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Little K. Y., Zhang L., Desmond T., Frey K. A., Dalack G. W., Cassin B. J. (1999). Striatal dopaminergic abnormalities in human cocaine users. Am. J. Psychiatry 156, 238–245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Manchip S. M., Hurel S. J. (1995). Rhabdomyolysis due to mania. Br. J. Psychiatry 167, 118–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Mann S. C., Boger W. P. (1978). Psychotropic drugs, summer heat and humidity, and hyperpyrexia: a danger restated. Am. J. Psychiatry 135, 1097–1100. 10.1176/ajp.135.9.1097 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Mann S. C., Caroff S. N., Gabor S., Ungavari S., Campbell E. C. (2013). Catatonia and malignant catatonia, and neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Curr. Psychiatr. Rev. 9, 1111–1119. 10.2174/1573400511309020005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Mash D. C. (2009). Biochemical brain markers in excited delirium deaths, in TASER® Conducted Electrical Weapons: Physiology and Pathology, and Law (chapter 29), eds Kroll M., Ho J. (New York, NY: Springer Kluwer; ), 365–378. [Google Scholar]
• Mash D. C., Duque L., Pablo J., Qin Y., Adi N., Hearn W. L., et al. . (2009). Brain biomarkers for identifying excited delirium as a cause of sudden death. Forensic Sci. Int. 190, e13–e19. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.05.012 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Mash D. C., Pablo J., Ouyang Q., Hearn W. L., Izenwasser S. (2002). Dopamine transport function is elevated in cocaine users. J. Neurochem. 81, 292–300. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.00820.x [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Mash D. C., Staley J. K. (1996). Cocaine recognition sites on the human dopamine transporter in drug overdose victims, in Neurotransmitter Transporters. Structure and Function, ed Reith M. E. A. (New York, NY: Humana; ), 56–67. [Google Scholar]
• Maudsley H. (1867). Acute mania and acute maniacal delirium. Br. J. Psychiatry 13, 59–65. 10.1192/bjp.13.61.59 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Mortensen O. V., Amara S. G. (2003). Dynamic regulation of the dopamine transporter. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 479, 159–170. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2003.08.066 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Onofrj M., Bonanni L., Cossu G., Manca D., Stocchi F., Thomas A. (2009). Emergencies in parkinsonism: akinetic crisis, life-threatening dyskinesias, and polyneuropathy during L-Dopa gel treatment. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 15, S233–S236. 10.1016/S1353-8020(09)70821-1 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Oppenheimer S. M., Wilson J. X., Guiraudon C., Cechetto D. F. (1991). Insular cortex stimulation produces lethal cardiac arrhythmias: a mechanism of sudden death? Brain Res. 550, 115–121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Penders T. M., Gestring R. E., Vilensky D. E. (2012). Intoxication delirium following use of synthetic cathinone derivatives. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 38, 616–617. 10.3109/00952990.2012.694535 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Perry W., Minassian A., Feifel D., Braff D. L. (2001). Sensorimotor gating deficits in bipolar disorder patients with acute psychotic mania. Biol. Psychiatry 50, 418–424. 10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01184-2 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Pierce R. C., Kalivas P. W. (1997). A circuitry model of the expression of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine-like psychostimulants. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 25, 192–216. 10.1016/S0165-0173(97)00021-0 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Post R. M., Rose H. (1976). Increasing effects of repetitive cocaine administration in the rat. Nature 260, 731–732. 10.1038/260731a0 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Qu S., Ondo W. G., Zhang X., Xie W. J., Pan T. H., Le W. D. (2006). Projections of diencephalic dopamine neurons into the spinal cord in mice. Exp. Brain Res. 168, 152–156. 10.1007/s00221-005-0075-1 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Reimer J., Kuhlmann A., Müller T. (2002). Neuroleptic malignant-like syndrome after rapid switch from bromocriptine to pergolide. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 9, 115–116. 10.1016/S1353-8020(01)00045-1 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Richter D. W., Mironov S. L., Büsselberg D., Lalley P. M., Bischoff A. M., Wilken B. (2000). Respiratory rhythm generation: plasticity of a neuronal network. Neuroscientist 6, 181–198. 10.1177/107385840000600309 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Ritz M. C., Lamb R. J., Goldberg S. R., Kuhar M. J. (1987). Cocaine receptors on dopamine transporters are related to self-administration of cocaine. Science 237, 1219–1223. 10.1126/science.2820058 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Robinson T. E., Berridge K. C. (1993). The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 18, 247–291. 10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-P [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Ross D. L. (1998). Factors associated with excited delirium deaths in police custody. Mod. Pathol. 11, 1127–1137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Rubinsztein J. S., Fletcher P. C., Rogers R. D., Ho L. W., Aigbirhio F. I., Paykel E. S., et al. . (2001). Decision making in mania: a PET study. Brain 124, 2550–2563. 10.1093/brain/124.12.2550 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Ruttenber A. J., Lawler-Heavner J., Yin M., Wetli C. V., Hearn W. L., Mash D. C. (1997). Fatal excited delirium following cocaine use: epidemiologic findings provide new evidence for mechanisms of cocaine toxicity. J. Forensic Sci. 42, 25–31. 10.1520/JFS14064J [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Ruttenber A. J., McAnally H. B., Wetli C. V. (1999). Cocaine-associated rhabdomyolysis and excited delirium: different stages of the same syndrome. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 20, 120–127. 10.1097/00000433-199906000-00003 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Samuels M. A. (2007). The brain-heart connection. Circulation 116, 77–84. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.678995 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Seeman P. (2011). All roads to schizophrenia lead to dopamine supersensitivity and elevated dopamine D2 receptors. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 17, 118–132. 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00162.x [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Sharkey S. W., Lesser J. R., Maron B. J. (2011). Cardiology patient page. Takotsubo (stress) cardiomyopathy. Circulation 124, e460–e462. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Shulack N. R. (1946). Exhaustion syndrome in excited psychotic patients. Am. J. Psychiatry 102, 466–475. 10.1176/ajp.102.4.466 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Silverstone T., Wells B., Trenchard E. (1983). Differential dose–response effects of dexamphetamine sulphate on hunger, arousal and mood in human volunteers. Psychopharmacology 79, 242–245. 10.1007/BF00427820 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Skagerberg G., Lindvall O. (1985). Organization of diencephalic dopamine neurones projecting to the spinal cord in the rat. Brain Res. 342, 340–351. 10.1016/0006-8993(85)91134-5 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Staley J. K., Hearn W. L., Ruttenber A. J., Wetli C. V., Mash D. C. (1994). High affinity cocaine recognition sites on the dopamine transporter are elevated in fatal cocaine overdose victims. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 271, 1678–1685. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Staley J. K., Wetli C. V., Ruttenber A. J., Hearn W. L., Mash D. C. (1996). Altered dopaminergic synaptic markers in cocaine psychosis and sudden death. NIDA Res. Monogr. Ser. 153, 491. [Google Scholar]
• Stauder K. H. (1934). Die todliche Katatonie. Arch. Psychiatr. Nervenkr. 102, 614–634. [Google Scholar]
• Stephens B. G., Jentzen J. M., Karch S., Wetli C. V., Mash D. C. (2004). National association of medical examiners position paper on the certification of cocaine-related deaths. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 25, 11–13. 10.1097/01.paf.0000114041.70865.24 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Stratton S. J., Rogers C., Brickett K., Gruzinski G. (2001). Factors associated with sudden death of individuals requiring restraint for excited delirium. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 19, 187–191. 10.1053/ajem.2001.22665 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Strawn J. R., Keck P. E., Jr., Caroff S. N. (2007). Neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Am. J. Psychiatry 164, 870–876. 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.6.870 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Surges R., Taggart P., Sander J. W., Walker M. C. (2010). Too long or too short? New insights into abnormal cardiac repolarization in people with chronic epilepsy and its potential role in sudden unexpected death. Epilepsia 51, 738–744. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02571.x [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Taggart P. (2013). Brain-heart interactions and cardiac ventricular arrhythmias. Neth. Hear. J. 21, 78–81. 10.1007/s12471-012-0365-8 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Taggart P., Critchley H., Lambiase P. D. (2011). Heart-brain interactions in cardiac arrhythmia. Heart 97, 698–708. 10.1136/hrt.2010.209304 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Takeuchi A., Ahern T. L., Henderson S. O. (2011). Excited delirium. West J. Emerg. Med. 12, 77–83. Available online at: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8n55r1kj [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Takubo H., Harada T., Hashimoto T., Inaba Y., Kanazawa I., Kuno S., et al. . (2003). A collaborative study on the malignant syndrome in Parkinson's disease and related disorders. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 9(Suppl. 1), S31–S41. 10.1016/S1353-8020(02)00122-0 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Ujike H., Sato M. (2004). Clinical features of sensitization to methamphetamine observed inpatients with methamphetamine dependence and psychosis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1025, 279–287. 10.1196/annals.1316.035 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• van Dyck C. H., Malison R. T., Jacobsen L. K., Seibyl J. P., Staley J. K., Laruelle M., et al. . (2005). Increased dopamine transporter availability associated with the 9-repeat allele of the SLC6A3 gene. J. Nucl. Med. 46, 745–751. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Vilke G. M., DeBard M. L., Chan T. C., Ho J. D., Dawes D. M., Hall C., et al. . (2012). Excited Delirium Syndrome (ExDS): defining based on a review of the literature. J. Emerg. Med. 43, 897–905. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.02.017 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Vincent S. G., Waddell A. E., Caron M. G., Walker J. K. L., Fisher J. T. (2007). A murine model of hyperdopaminergic state displays altered respiratory control. FASEB J. 21, 1463–1471. 10.1096/fj.06-7248com [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Weinberger D. R., Kelly M. J. (1977). Catatonia and malignant syndrome: a possible complication of neuroleptic administration. Report of a case involving haloperidol. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 165, 263–268. 10.1097/00005053-197710000-00006 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Wetli C. V. (1987). Fatal cocaine intoxication. A review. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 8, 1–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Wetli C. V. (2005). Excited delirium, in Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine, Vol. 2, eds Byard R., Payne-James J. (Glasgow: Elsevier; ), 276–281. [Google Scholar]
• Wetli C. V., Fishbain D. A. (1985). Cocaine-induced psychosis and sudden death in recreational cocaine users. J. Forensic Sci. 30, 873–880. 10.1520/JFS11020J [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Wetli C. V., Mash D., Karch S. B. (1996). Cocaine-associated agitated delirium and the neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 14, 425–428. 10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90066-2 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
• Zahniser N. R., Gerhardt G. A., Cass W. A. (1995). Chronic cocaine action on the dopamine transporter, in The Neurobiology of Cocaine: Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms, ed Hammer R. L., Jr. (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; ), 181–197. [Google Scholar]
• Zahniser N. R., Gerhardt G. A., Hoffman A. F., Lupica C. R. (1998). Voltage-dependency of the dopamine transporter in rat brain, in Advances in Pharmacology, Vol. 42 eds Goldstein D., Eisenhofer G., McCarty R. (San Diego, CA: Academic Press; ), 195–198 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Zapata A., Chefer V. I., Ator R., Shippenberg T. S., Rocha B. A. (2003). Behavioural sensitization and enhanced dopamine response in the nucleus accumbens after intravenous cocaine self-administration in mice. Eur. J. Neurosci. 17, 590–596. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02491.x [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]